2014
DOI: 10.7550/rmb.34716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodiversidad de Odonata en México

Abstract: An up to date chapter on the Odonata of Mexico is presented. Since the last update in 2006, 5 new species were described, 11 new records were added and 14 species have been described in their larval stage. Hence, the Mexican list presented here is constituted by a total of 355 species. Comments on endemism, endangered species and/or at risk are included.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study is a conservation assessment of the genus Paraphlebia , with relevant data for conservation measures and interpretation of future distribution. Despite the fact that P. hyalina has a very restricted distribution (González‐Soriano & Novelo‐Gutiérrez, ) and that there was no prior evaluation by the IUCN (), we propose that its status should be data deficient, awaiting for more data, or endangered if we consider only its reduced AOO. Thus, we recommend continuing with field searches in places where this species has been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our study is a conservation assessment of the genus Paraphlebia , with relevant data for conservation measures and interpretation of future distribution. Despite the fact that P. hyalina has a very restricted distribution (González‐Soriano & Novelo‐Gutiérrez, ) and that there was no prior evaluation by the IUCN (), we propose that its status should be data deficient, awaiting for more data, or endangered if we consider only its reduced AOO. Thus, we recommend continuing with field searches in places where this species has been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…En la figura 5 se muestra el mapa de calidad del agua de la zona de estudio en función del BMWP/col. Desde el punto de vista biótico, las familias encontradas en E 1 son indicadoras de aguas limpias o de buena calidad, caracterizadas por estar bien oxigenadas, con inexistente predominio de procesos de oxidación de materia orgánica (Roldán, 1988; De la Lanza-Espino, Pulido y Pérez, 2000;Hahn-Von Hessberg et al, 2009;Oscoz, Galicia y Miranda, 2009;Rosado, 2009; Flowers y La Rosa, 2010; Gutiérrez y Reinoso-Flórez, 2010; Oliveira y Callisto, 2010; Ramírez, 2010;Forero, 2013;Gil et al., 2013; González-Soriano y Novelo- Gutiérrez, 2014;Jiménez, 2014). En E 2 , las familias identificadas son indicadoras de estrés en el ecosistema, tolerantes a aguas menos oxigenadas, de bajo caudal y con aportes de materia orgánica (Roldán, 1988;Oscoz, Galicia y Miranda, 2009;Rosado, 2009); no obstante, a la existencia de familias representantes de los órdenes Ephemeroptera y Coleóptera, estas consisten en familias relativamente tolerantes a niveles de estrés por materia orgánica (Oscoz, Galicia y Miranda, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Por el contrario, Platystictidae y Lestidae presentaron los menores rangos de distribución, debido a que los adultos de Platystictidae tienen hábitos muy restringidos, se encuentran normalmente en el sotobosque y tienen un periodo de vuelo corto (Ramírez, 2010;González-Soriano & Novelo-Gutiérrez, 2014). Por su parte, Lestidae se encuentra en áreas abiertas y sus larvas se pueden encontrar en aguas lentas, remansos de arroyos, pantanos o pozas temporales (Ramírez, 2010), sin embargo, es una familia con tolerancia moderada a las condiciones climáticas, por lo que es más común en altitudes bajas (Samways, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified