2016
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodiversity and ecosystem stability across scales in metacommunities

Abstract: Although diversity-stability relationships have been extensively studied in local ecosystems, the global biodiversity crisis calls for an improved understanding of these relationships in a spatial context. Here we use a dynamical model of competitive metacommunities to study the relationships between species diversity and ecosystem variability across scales. We derive analytic relationships under a limiting case; these results are extended to more general cases with numerical simulations. Our model shows that,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
350
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
29
350
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…specialists vs generalists) -the counterpart of the spatial insurance is a buffering effect of biotic interaction processes which can lead to a homogenisation of the regional ecosystems and its subsequent risks of biodiversity loss (Olden et al 2004, Shanafelt et al 2015, Wang and Loreau 2016. specialists vs generalists) -the counterpart of the spatial insurance is a buffering effect of biotic interaction processes which can lead to a homogenisation of the regional ecosystems and its subsequent risks of biodiversity loss (Olden et al 2004, Shanafelt et al 2015, Wang and Loreau 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…specialists vs generalists) -the counterpart of the spatial insurance is a buffering effect of biotic interaction processes which can lead to a homogenisation of the regional ecosystems and its subsequent risks of biodiversity loss (Olden et al 2004, Shanafelt et al 2015, Wang and Loreau 2016. specialists vs generalists) -the counterpart of the spatial insurance is a buffering effect of biotic interaction processes which can lead to a homogenisation of the regional ecosystems and its subsequent risks of biodiversity loss (Olden et al 2004, Shanafelt et al 2015, Wang and Loreau 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it requires understanding how biological diversity will enhance ecosystem stability (McCann, 2000;Hooper et al, 2005;Strong et al, 2015). There is a wealth of theoretical and empirical data to support the contention that biodiversity (numbers of distinct species, but also functional diversity) enhances both ecosystem productivity and its resistance to perturbation (e.g., Isbell et al, 2015a,b;Wang and Loreau, 2016). Habitats and species diversity are intrinsically intertwined, and baseline diversity is highly variable.…”
Section: Structural Taxonomic Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between ecological diversity and stability has been a subject of debate within the scientific community [25][26][27][28]. Theory predicts a positive correlation between diversity and stability in ecological communities [29], but there has been much discussion about how these factors should be defined and quantified.…”
Section: Ecological Principles and Polyculturesmentioning
confidence: 99%