2006
DOI: 10.3354/meps311191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship in microphytobenthic diatoms of the Westerschelde estuary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
39
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies in temperate areas showed that epipsammic taxa were mainly associated with sandy substrates whereas epipelic taxa were mainly found in muddy to clayey substrates (FORSTER et al, 2006). Our results in St. Lawrence marshes are in agreement with these findings since the abundance of epipsammic forms can be roughly predicted from coarse sand concentrations (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies in temperate areas showed that epipsammic taxa were mainly associated with sandy substrates whereas epipelic taxa were mainly found in muddy to clayey substrates (FORSTER et al, 2006). Our results in St. Lawrence marshes are in agreement with these findings since the abundance of epipsammic forms can be roughly predicted from coarse sand concentrations (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These diatoms can be divided in two distinct groups: the epipsammic forms attached to particles, and the epipelic free-living forms (ROUND, 1971(ROUND, , 1979. Epipelic diatoms are generally the most important component of the autotrophic biomass (FORSTER et al, 2006) found in these areas. They are affected by water movements and can migrate within the first top centimeters of the sediment (SABUROVA and POLIKARPOV, 2003) allowing the establishment and maintenance of epipelic forms within sedimentary environments (CONSALVEY et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies report on changes in abundance or diversity of microor macrobenthic communities in chronically polluted marine environments. Other fundamental aspects, such as how pollution affect respiration rates, primary production (Sundbäck et al, 2004;Forster et al, 2006;Rubino et al, 2016), prokaryotic heterotrophic production or other microbial processes (Manini et al, 2004;Pusceddu et al, 2014;Sweetman et al, 2014;Franzo et al, 2016a) have seldom been analyzed in chemically polluted environments. Studies on benthic ecosystem functioning, based on actual estimates of biological processes integrated with the qualitative and quantitative composition of communities at different trophic levels, are even rarer (Schaffner et al, 2008;Cibic et al, 2012b;Franzo et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terlizzi et al 2005, Forster et al 2006, Heino et al 2007). However, it has been suggested that the challenge is to measure diversity not only with a single measure (such as taxonomic-based indices), but also to incorporate other concepts that offer a complementary perspective (for example giving information about trophic structure), so that our knowledge of ecosystem processes is improved (Purvis & Hector 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%