2015
DOI: 10.1093/icb/icv084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodiversity Meets Neuroscience: From the Sequencing Ship (Ship-Seq) to Deciphering Parallel Evolution of Neural Systems in Omic’s Era

Abstract: The origins of neural systems and centralized brains are one of the major transitions in evolution. These events might occur more than once over 570-600 million years. The convergent evolution of neural circuits is evident from a diversity of unique adaptive strategies implemented by ctenophores, cnidarians, acoels, molluscs, and basal deuterostomes. But, further integration of biodiversity research and neuroscience is required to decipher critical events leading to development of complex integrative and cogni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If correct, it would be critically important to identify the genes that were supposedly lost in sponges and placozoans (but preserved in ctenophores) that led to the loss of neurons and synapses. We believe that this massive functional neuronal/synaptic loss is also unlikely, because there is not a single example of a loss of neural systems in any non-parasitic animal lineage [ 68 ]. Indeed, according to the monophyletic hypothesis, it should be assumed that the common ancestor of ctenophores shared the same transmitters and neurogenic genes as the extant members of the Porifera, Placozoa and bilaterian–cnidarian clades.…”
Section: Polygenesis Versus Single Origin: Comparison Of the Two Altementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If correct, it would be critically important to identify the genes that were supposedly lost in sponges and placozoans (but preserved in ctenophores) that led to the loss of neurons and synapses. We believe that this massive functional neuronal/synaptic loss is also unlikely, because there is not a single example of a loss of neural systems in any non-parasitic animal lineage [ 68 ]. Indeed, according to the monophyletic hypothesis, it should be assumed that the common ancestor of ctenophores shared the same transmitters and neurogenic genes as the extant members of the Porifera, Placozoa and bilaterian–cnidarian clades.…”
Section: Polygenesis Versus Single Origin: Comparison Of the Two Altementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional analysis of the electrical synapses in ctenophores is in its infancy [ 70 , 117 ]. Interestingly, the PANX/INX genes are one of the most highly expressed transcripts in the adult aboral organ of P. bachei ( figure 5 d ; [ 28 ]), but they are also expressed in the combs and conductive tracts and in the neuron-like subepithelial cells.…”
Section: Convergent and Parallel Evolution Of Electrical Synapses In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…serotonin, dopamine, noradrenalin, adrenalin, octopamine, acetylcholine, histamine) were not detected by ultrasensitive microchemical assays; and 4) initial pharmacological screening of known bilaterian transmitters produced neither detectable changes in muscle conductivity/excitability, nor changed ciliary beating in their combs (Moroz et al, ). These and other molecular findings led to the hypotheses of independent origins of neural systems in ctenophores (see details and historical overviews in Moroz, , ; Moroz, ). Marlow and Arendt (2015) challenged this polygenesis hypothesis by suggesting additional candidates for pan‐synaptic and pan‐neuronal molecular markers that might genealogically unite ctenophore and other nervous systems (Marlow and Arendt, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cnidaria and Bilateria are united as the distinct clade of animals with nervous systems that possibly share a common origin. In contrast, ctenophores might have evolved neural and muscular systems independently from the common ancestor of Cnidaria+Bilateria (Moroz, ; Moroz, ; Moroz et al, ; Moroz & Kohn, ). Thus, Eumetazoa could be a polyphyletic taxon, and Cnidaria is a key reference group to understand the origin of integrative systems in bilaterians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%