Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) have complex life cycles involving tick vectors and vertebrate hosts. However, there is limited empirical evidence on the zoonotic circulation of TBPs. In this study, we used a One Health approach to study the possible circulation of TBPs in ticks, animals and humans within a rural household in the foothills of the Fruška Gora mountain, northern Serbia. The presence of TBP DNA was assessed using microfluidic PCR (25 bacterial species, 7 parasite species, 5 bacterial genera, 3 parasite genera) in animal, human and tick samples and the presence of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) RNA was screened for using RT-qPCR on tick samples. In addition, Lyme borreliosis serology was assessed in patients sera.
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
and
Ixodes ricinus
ticks were identified on dogs and
Haemaphysalis punctata
was identified on house walls.
Rickettsia helvetica
was the most common pathogen detected in pooled
R. sanguineus
and
I. ricinus
tick samples, followed by
Hepatozoon canis
. None of the
H. punctata
tick samples tested positive for the presence of TBPs.
Anaplasma phagocytophilum
and
Rickettsia monacensis
were the most frequent pathogens detected in dogs, followed by
Rickettsia felis
, whereas
Anaplasma bovis
was the only pathogen found in one of the goats tested. None of the human blood samples collected from family members tested positive for the presence of TBPs. Although microfluidic PCR did not detect
Borrelia
sp. in any of the tested tick or blood samples, a family member with a history of Lyme disease was seropositive for
Borrelia burgdorferi
sensu lato (s.l.). We conclude that, despite the presence of TBPs in tick and vertebrate reservoirs, there is no evidence of infection with TBPs across various components of the epidemiological chain in a rural Fruška Gora household.