Espacios 2020
DOI: 10.48082/espacios-a20v41n43p02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioeconomy: bibliometric analysis from 2006 to 2019

Abstract: This research aimed at the understanding of bioeconomy through the exploration of scientific studies related to the concept in academic literature. A bibliometric analysis was carried out with 2.321 publications in the Web of Science database between 2006-2019. The structural analysis of the work in bioeconomy showed that there is a high rate of cooperation with a rich research network between institutions of European countries (8 of 11 groups) and comparatively a low level of collaboration with other nations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of these studies analyzed consumer choices or public acceptance relating to the bioeconomy in Africa. In particular, authors have acknowledged that the knowledge base for the bioeconomy lags behind in Africa (Bambo and Pouris, 2020;Perea et al, 2020;Feleke et al, 2021;Mougenot and Doussoulin, 2022). A literature search shows no past research has attempted to explore, at an individual level, public acceptance of bioeconomy as a low-carbon technological innovation to combat climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these studies analyzed consumer choices or public acceptance relating to the bioeconomy in Africa. In particular, authors have acknowledged that the knowledge base for the bioeconomy lags behind in Africa (Bambo and Pouris, 2020;Perea et al, 2020;Feleke et al, 2021;Mougenot and Doussoulin, 2022). A literature search shows no past research has attempted to explore, at an individual level, public acceptance of bioeconomy as a low-carbon technological innovation to combat climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the foregoing, and sparse information on the influence of individual-level factors on consumers' acceptance of bioeconomy (Ramcilovic-Suominen and Pülzl, 2018;Navrátilová et al, 2020), it is important to understand effects of individual-level factors on consumers' acceptance of biobased products to increase the share of biobased products in the consumer market towards achieving the desired level of acceptance of in the society. This is much more important in Africa where adoption of biobased products is quite scant (Ncube et al, 2022;Sekabira et al,2022;Fertahi et al, 2023) and knowledge base for the bioeconomy remains limited (Perea et al, 2020;Faleke et al, 2021;Mougenot & Doussoulin, 2022). In order to expand the literature on acceptance of bioeconomy , this study is focused on exploring the effects of three individual-level factors, namely subjective knowledge, environmental attitude and perceived usefulness, and five socio-demographic factors (gender, age , marital status, education level and place of residence) on consumers' acceptance of biobased products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%