2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/953060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioelectrical Impedance and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Assessments of Changes in Body Composition Following Exercise in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract: We aimed to compare the level of agreement between leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis (LBIA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for assessing changes in body composition following exercise intervention among individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Forty-four adults with T2DM, age 53.2 ± 9.1 years; BMI 30.8 ± 5.9 kg/m2 participated in a 6-month exercise program with pre and post intervention assessments of body composition. Fat free mass (FFM), % body fat (%FM) and fat mass (FM) were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, we measured the height of the participants without footwear, weight, and body fat in light clothing, and then calculated their body mass index (BMI), as weight divided by height squared. This method can accurately detect changes in body composition and the validity of body composition assessment is high (Miyatani et al 2012 ; Utter et al 1999 ). Day-to-day coefficients of variations (CVs) for body weight, body fat, and BMI were all <10 % under our experimental conditions (Nishiwaki et al 2014a , b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, we measured the height of the participants without footwear, weight, and body fat in light clothing, and then calculated their body mass index (BMI), as weight divided by height squared. This method can accurately detect changes in body composition and the validity of body composition assessment is high (Miyatani et al 2012 ; Utter et al 1999 ). Day-to-day coefficients of variations (CVs) for body weight, body fat, and BMI were all <10 % under our experimental conditions (Nishiwaki et al 2014a , b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A light cotton gown was used to control for weight of clothing. Epidemiological studies in both the US and abroad indicate that this type of BIA provides %BF results statistically indistinguishable from other methods such as Dual Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) (Vasudev et al, ; Boneva‐Asiova and Boyanov, ; Miyatani et al, ). Some caution in interpretation is warranted, as BIA tends to show slightly less agreement with DEXA at the highest and lowest ends of the distribution, and the prediction equations are based on Western populations (Boneva‐Asiova and Boyanov, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Inclusion criteria required the participants to be between the ages of 18 and 55. Due to uncertain validity of body fat measures in morbidly obese subjects (>40 kg/m 2 ), subjects with a BMI >40 kg/m 2 were excluded [36]. Due to the use of electrical currents in the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), pregnant subjects were also excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BIA scale accurately weighs up to 440 pounds. However, body fat percentage could be overestimated in patients who are dehydrated due to BIA scales assuming normal hydration [36]. Participants were given a protocol sheet when scheduled for assessment to promote proper hydration the day before and the day of their assessment.…”
Section: Body Adiposity Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%