1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80040-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
66
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this reduction is very small, with the mean cost of amputee walking across all ESR feet being 97.3 percent of that with a SACH foot. This confirms what only a few studies have shown with statistical significance (p < 0.05) [12][13]. The majority of studies have failed to obtain statistically significant results [3][4]6,[14][15][16][17][18], probably because of insufficient statistical power to detect such small differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, this reduction is very small, with the mean cost of amputee walking across all ESR feet being 97.3 percent of that with a SACH foot. This confirms what only a few studies have shown with statistical significance (p < 0.05) [12][13]. The majority of studies have failed to obtain statistically significant results [3][4]6,[14][15][16][17][18], probably because of insufficient statistical power to detect such small differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The majority of studies have failed to obtain statistically significant results [3][4]6,[14][15][16][17][18], probably because of insufficient statistical power to detect such small differences. The lack of a relationship between speed and normalized ESR COT (Figure 2(b)) was unexpected because it has previously been suggested that ESR feet may only be effective compared with SACH feet at higher walking speeds [3,12]. It is interesting to note that the apparent clustering of the 10 lowest points in the normalized ESR COT analysis (Figure 2(b)) is based on data from six different studies [4,[12][13]15,[17][18] and six different ESR foot designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations