Bioenergy Crops: Recent Advances and Future Outlook

Yadav, Pramendra; Priyanka, P.; Kumar, Dileep; Yadav, Anurag; Yadav, Kusum

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14463-0_12

Cited by 42 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 108 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[Katschnig, et al, (2013)]. For using soil salinity 7.7ds/m the yield production of barley, cotton, sorghum, wheat is 100% -100% -85.6% -87.93% respectively [Maas, (1984) ] 3) Planting energy crops in saline soil with high salinity levels and heavy metals contained [Yadav, et al, (2019)]. Energy crops may be a suitable alternative to use saline land without reclamation.…”

Section: Mitigation Of Risksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing Risks of Water and Soil Salinity on Water Use Efficiency

Amer¹,

Wahed²,

Abd-Elhamid³

et al. 2020

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (Ijciet)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Salinity is a major problem affecting crop production all over the world. About 20% of cultivated land in the world, and 33% of irrigated land are salt-affected and degraded, which intensively affects food security. Many researches pointed to its negative impact on yi ld reduction. Although most previous researches addressed the e problem of salinity using stochastic data, they used deterministic methods. This paper aims to use stochastic methods to assess risks of salinity on water use efficiency, and propose strategies to mitigate these risks. Management actions and policies are proposed to manage yield reduction and water use efficiency and mitigate salinity risks. This study expected yield reduction due to major causes of soil salinity. Adopting the suggested strategies could reduce or eliminate the impact of salinity.

show abstract

Section: Mitigation Of Risksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing Risks of Water and Soil Salinity on Water Use Efficiency

Amer¹,

Wahed²,

Abd-Elhamid³

et al. 2020

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (Ijciet)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the effects of both biotic (intercropping competition) and abiotic stress (e.g., drought) need to be further investigated with reference to marginal agricultural land utilization. This is because the cultivation of miscanthus should be promoted on marginal agricultural lands (rather than on favorable sites to avoid land use competition with food crop cultivation) [79][80][81]. The cultivation conditions on marginal agricultural lands can be challenging for miscanthus, which could worsen the recovery success of miscanthus.…”

Section: Three-year Averagementioning

confidence: 99%

Methane Yield Potential of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Established under Maize (Zea mays L.)

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study reports on the effects of two rhizome-based establishment procedures ‘miscanthus under maize’ (MUM) and ‘reference’ (REF) on the methane yield per hectare (MYH) of miscanthus in a field trial in southwest Germany. The dry matter yield (DMY) of aboveground biomass was determined each year in autumn over four years (2016–2019). A biogas batch experiment and a fiber analysis were conducted using plant samples from 2016–2018. Overall, MUM outperformed REF due to a high MYH of maize in 2016 (7211 m3N CH4 ha−1). The MYH of miscanthus in MUM was significantly lower compared to REF in 2016 and 2017 due to a lower DMY. Earlier maturation of miscanthus in MUM caused higher ash and lignin contents compared with REF. However, the mean substrate-specific methane yield of miscanthus was similar across the treatments (281.2 and 276.2 lN kg−1 volatile solid−1). Non-significant differences in MYH 2018 (1624 and 1957 m3N CH4 ha−1) and in DMY 2019 (15.6 and 21.7 Mg ha−1) between MUM and REF indicate, that MUM recovered from biotic and abiotic stress during 2016. Consequently, MUM could be a promising approach to close the methane yield gap of miscanthus cultivation in the first year of establishment.

show abstract

“…The need to reduce the impact of energy use on climate and provide an environmentally sustainable energy source, while stimulating rural development has played a major role in the shift to promoting the production of bioenergy crops. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems Yadav et al [6] classified bioenergy crops into first, second and third generation bioenergy crops, dedicated energy crops and halophytes. Crops such as corn, sorghum, rape seed and sugarcane belong to the first generation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Land Resource Areas and Spatial Analysis of Potential Location of Bioenergy Crops Production in Mississippi

Twumasi¹,

Merem²,

Namwamba³

et al. 2021

JSBS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mississippi State is renowned for its land resource areas (LRA) and production of bioenergy crops which generate both agricultural and economic benefits. Agricultural commodities play a key role in economic growth, therefore the ability to produce more would enhance development. This paper offers an analysis of the production of bioenergy crops in Mississippi. Relative measures, time series graphs and descriptive statistics coupled with geographic information systems (GIS) mapping using ArcMap were employed to generate the outcome of this research. The outcome of the statistical analysis indicated that corn and soybeans were the most produced crops in Agricultural Districts 10 and 40. These districts produced more bioenergy crops than the other districts. GIS mapping results also showed that the potential area for bioenergy crops is in zone 131 of the Mississippi Land Resource Area (MLRA). This zone has an absolute advantage in the production of these crops which includes the diversity of biomass production such as corn, cotton, soybeans, wheat, rice, barley, grain sorghum, canola, camelina, algae, hardwoods, and softwood. The paper recommends a constant GIS mapping and land management systems for each agricultural district in Mississippi to enable researchers and farmers to determine the factors which contribute towards the increasing and decreasing trends in the production of How to cite this paper: Twumasi, Y.A.,

show abstract

Bioenergy Crops: Recent Advances and Future Outlook

Cited by 42 publications

References 108 publications

Managing Risks of Water and Soil Salinity on Water Use Efficiency

Managing Risks of Water and Soil Salinity on Water Use Efficiency

Methane Yield Potential of Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Established under Maize (Zea mays L.)

Land Resource Areas and Spatial Analysis of Potential Location of Bioenergy Crops Production in Mississippi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About