2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioenergy production potential for aboveground biomass from a subtropical constructed wetland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature agrees that the factors which most affect the production and use of plant biomass are related to harvesting time, type of species and wastewater quality. Various studies have focused on the effects of biomass harvesting on CW performance in terms of carbon sequestration, nutrient removal and pathogen control, and have also examined the impacts of harvesting time on biomass yield [2425, 64]. However, the concept of wetland biomass as a source of bioenergy has rarely been reported in literature and detailed research is lacking [6566].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature agrees that the factors which most affect the production and use of plant biomass are related to harvesting time, type of species and wastewater quality. Various studies have focused on the effects of biomass harvesting on CW performance in terms of carbon sequestration, nutrient removal and pathogen control, and have also examined the impacts of harvesting time on biomass yield [2425, 64]. However, the concept of wetland biomass as a source of bioenergy has rarely been reported in literature and detailed research is lacking [6566].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management of Typha often includes removal of biomass (Fig. 9d), and recent research and reviews have examined the potential use of this biomass as a biofuel crop (Dubbe et al 1988;Ciria et al 2005;Wang et al 2011;Grosshans et al 2013;Grosshans 2014;Grosshans et al 2014;Elhaak et al 2015;Rahman et al 2015;Svedarsky et al 2016;Ahmad et al 2017;Berry et al 2017;Rebaque et al 2017;Carson et al 2018). In a review of Typha management in the northern Great Plains, Svedarsky et al (2016) highlighted numerous advantages that Typha has over other sources of biomass, including that it occurs in wetland areas that are not suitable for conventional agriculture, it is quickly renewable, it is a Cneutral resource, tillage and replanting are typically not required, and harvesting Typha can improve wetland habitats.…”
Section: Biomass Harvestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their operation and maintenance is very simple and they hold costs of O&M well below those produced in conventional wastewater treatment plants. They can be constructed out of local materials, and present great adaptability and resilience, providing multiple ecosystem services and even acting as revenue generators (Hansson et al, 2012;Ni et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2015). In recent decades the CW technology has rapidly evolved through the use of various designs and operational modes or other intensifications so as to improve effluent water quality with respect to various pollutants (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%