Bioethanol Production from Apple Pomace left after Juice Extraction

Chatanta, Dinesh Kumar; Attri, Chandrika; Gopal, Krishan; Devi, M. Kalpana; Gupta, Gauri; Bhalla, Tek Chand

doi:10.5580/3a8

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…During fermentation with pure culture of S. cerevisiae MTCC 173 (1% inoculum) 8.44% (v/w) ethanol was recovered after 72h of incubation at 301 C. However, with the use of co-cultures i.e. S. cerevisiae MTCC 173, A. Foetidus MTCC 151, F. oxysporum MTCC 1755 the ethanol yield increased to 16.09% (v/w) and sugar concentration further decreased to 0.15% after 72 h incubation at 30 1C [29]. Recently, Borah and Mishra [17] carried out ethanol production using AP and rotten banana as a substrate by treating it with distilled water, small amount of sucrose and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (collected from "FRI, Dehradun", India).…”

Section: Biofuelsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Lignocellulosic ethanol is expected to be commercialized during the next decade as renewable energy for transport. Various studies have demonstrated the potential of AP as a substrate for bioethanol production [79,128,129,94,147,29]. SSF has been carried out for the production of ethanol from AP using consortia of cultures including S. cerevisiae MTCC 173 (ethanol producer), A. foetidus MTCC 117 (pectinase producer) and F. oxysporum MTCC 1755 (cellulase producer).…”

Section: Biofuelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Perspective of apple processing wastes as low-cost substrates for bioproduction of high value products: A review

Dhillon

Kaur

Brar

2013

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

248

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Biofuelsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Biofuelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspective of apple processing wastes as low-cost substrates for bioproduction of high value products: A review

Dhillon

Kaur

Brar

2013

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

248

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Samples were withdrawn from this fermentation wash and were analyzed further. Ethanol produced in each SSF was estimated by potassium dichromate method (Chatanta et al, 2007).…”

Section: Solid-state Fermentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bioethanol Production From Apple Pomace Using Co-Cultures With Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Solid-State Fermentation

Kumar¹,

Karan²,

Verma³

2020

J microb biotech food sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was isolation and screening of apple pomace utilizing microorganisms from soil which can be used as co-culture with S. cerevisiae for production of bioethanol. In this study, fifteen microorganisms were isolated from soil near the dumping site of apple pomace at HPMC, Parwanoo, H.P. on medium enriched with apple pomace. These isolates were assigned codes APW 1-15 and were screened for their potential to produce cellulase, xylanase and ethanol. The selected isolates were used as co-culture with S. cerevisiae for bioethanol production. All the isolates exhibited cellulase and xylanase activities ranging from 228.2 to 502.5 U/mL/min and 185.3 to 1010.7 U/mL/min respectively, but only three isolates (APW-02, APW-04 and APW-12) produced ethanol. Isolate APW-13 exhibited highest cellulase activity (502.5 U/mL/min), APW-04 showed highest xylanase activity (1010.7 U/mL/min) and APW-12 produced highest amount of ethanol (36 g/L). Two isolates (APW-12 and APW-13) were selected to co-culture with S. cerevisiae in solid-state fermentation of apple pomace for ethanol production. S. cerevisiae and isolate APW-12 co-culture fermentation resulted in higher ethanol production (49.64 g/L) than S. cerevisiae and APW-13 co-culture fermentation (41.7 g/L) while, S. cerevisiae alone produced 37.6 g/L ethanol. Isolate APW-12 and APW-13 belonged to genera Actinomyces and Bacillus respectively.

show abstract

“…Many researchers recovered bioethanol from cellulosic materials at 5:87 %, 6:12 % and 6:91 % (v/v), using S. cerevisiae, Cytophaga hutchnisonni and other isolated culture respectively (Sharif-Hossain, 2015; Byadgi and Kalburgi, 2016). However, high bioethanol titers could be obtained under optimized conditions (16:9 % (v/v), using the combinations of S. cerevisiae, Aspergillus foetidus and Fusarium oxysporum during simultaneous saccharification and fermentation) (Chatanta et al, 2008).…”

Section: Evaluation Of Consortium Cs2 As a Starter Culture During Bio...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Production of biogas and ethanol from stationery wastes using a microbial consortium isolated from soil as starter culture

Ananou

Bougarne

Manni

et al. 2021

Universitas Scientiarum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The conventional pretreatments used during the valorization of paper waste in renewable energies are expensive, long, slow, require high temperatures and particularly not eco-friendly. However, the application of microbial cultures with cellulolytic capabilities becomes an attractive and low-cost strategy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to screen an efficient microbial culture and its evaluation as a starter culture during hydrolysis process of biogas and bioethanol production. Our results indicated that from 18 isolates, two bacteria (identified as Pseudomonas horyzihabitans and Serratia liquefaciens) and one consortium (CS2, predominated by Enterobacteriaceae) had an important cellulosic hydrolysis activity. The application of the selected consortium as a starter culture during the hydrolysis process of biogas and bioethanol production improved yields. Indeed, the application of CS2 enhanced the biogas and bioethanol yields to 9.4 mL g−1 and 78.2 μL g−1 (P < 0.05) respectively. Also, starter culture CS2 addition reduced the time needed for cellulosic hydrolysis to 21 days, respect to 24 days in control sample, during biogas production under psychrophilic temperature. Thus, this low cost and practical procedure can be used as an efficient strategy to release sugars from paper waste, to reduce the time needed for cellulosic biodigestion, and to enhance the biogas and bioethanol recovered.

show abstract

Bioethanol Production from Apple Pomace left after Juice Extraction

Cited by 11 publications

References 4 publications

Perspective of apple processing wastes as low-cost substrates for bioproduction of high value products: A review

Perspective of apple processing wastes as low-cost substrates for bioproduction of high value products: A review

Bioethanol Production From Apple Pomace Using Co-Cultures With Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Solid-State Fermentation

Production of biogas and ethanol from stationery wastes using a microbial consortium isolated from soil as starter culture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About