2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-020-04853-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofilm eradication by in situ generation of reactive chlorine species on nano-CuO surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Di Rosa et al [ 47 ], biofilm formation can be modulated by environmental conditions, gelatinase activity, and the presence of the esp gene. However, it is worth stressing that the joint action of several parameters (time, temperature, nutrients, genetic factors) can be more critical compared to a single factor [ 48 , 49 ]. However, in the light of numerous literature data, gelE has been recognized as a factor unrelated to biofilm formation [ 13 , 50 , 51 , 52 ], which was confirmed by the results of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Di Rosa et al [ 47 ], biofilm formation can be modulated by environmental conditions, gelatinase activity, and the presence of the esp gene. However, it is worth stressing that the joint action of several parameters (time, temperature, nutrients, genetic factors) can be more critical compared to a single factor [ 48 , 49 ]. However, in the light of numerous literature data, gelE has been recognized as a factor unrelated to biofilm formation [ 13 , 50 , 51 , 52 ], which was confirmed by the results of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the use of copper materials on membrane systems (i.e., reverse osmosis membranes) or in dental care procedures has also been explored by the scientific community, however, at a lower extent (5% and 7% of the manuscripts works). The remaining 7% of original studies were related with the petrochemical industry (1.7%) [ 45 ], construction sector–bricks (1.7%) [ 46 ], food contacting surfaces (1.7%) [ 47 ] and space flight materials (1.7%) [ 48 ].…”
Section: Copper Surfaces On Biofilm Prevention and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dygico, et al [ 122 ] tested different materials that can be found in the mushroom production environment such as SS, aluminum, rubber, polypropylene, polycarbonate, concrete, borosilicate glass and copper and found that the use of copper reduced significantly the number of culturable Listeria monocytogens adhered on the surface [ 122 ]. Copper-based nanotechnology was tested for the development of safe food-contact surfaces [ 47 , 121 ]. Ghasemian, et al [ 121 ] coated glass and SS surfaces (commonly found in food industry) with copper NPs and found a significant reduction in bacterial adhesion on coated surfaces.…”
Section: Other Applications For Copper Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scientists have developed many strategies to fight bacterial biofilms. Among them, some methods have been specifically used to inhibit the formation of biofilms. These methods either use small-molecule organic compounds to inhibit the surface adhesion of bacteria at the initial stage and interfere with the quorum sensing system or use specific pathway inhibitors to inhibit the synthesis of second nucleotide messenger molecules and the maturation of biofilms. However, the biofilm infection that has already occurred is inevitable, so researchers have also designed some strategies to combat the preformed biofilm. Common methods of destroying preformed biofilms include electrochemical methods and the use of antibacterial components with anti-biofilm activity, biomolecules capable of degrading extracellular polymers, and drug delivery systems to destroy mature biofilms. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%