1990
DOI: 10.1029/wr026i009p02161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofilm growth and the related changes in the physical properties of a porous medium: 2. Permeability

Abstract: Growth of a biofilm in a porous medium reduces the total volume and the average size of the pores. The change in the pore size distributions is easily quantified when certain geometric assumptions are made. Existing models of permeability or of relative permeability can be manipulated to yield estimates of the resulting reduction in permeability as a function of biofilm thickness. The associated reductions in porosity and specific surface can be estimated as well. Based on a sphere model of the medium, the Koz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
128
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The module for updating the PSD with changes in mineral volume is based on the film approach by Taylor et al [18], which assesses the effect of bacterial growth on flow and transport in saturated porous media. The authors state that the extension of their model to the case of unsaturated flow is straightforward.…”
Section: Fig 1 Near Herementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The module for updating the PSD with changes in mineral volume is based on the film approach by Taylor et al [18], which assesses the effect of bacterial growth on flow and transport in saturated porous media. The authors state that the extension of their model to the case of unsaturated flow is straightforward.…”
Section: Fig 1 Near Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we assume a unique functional dependency of on and therefore neglect hysteresis in the water retention. The drainable pore-size density function (or PSD) is obtain y differentiation of the cumulative PSD with respect to [18,54]: ed b .…”
Section: Pore Bundle Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The primary differences between these two descriptions is that the structured models have the potential to represent the influence of biofilm structure on mass transfer (both diffusion and convection within the fluid and biofilm phases) and on momentum transfer (i.e., the change in permeability due to reduction in the pore volume), whereas unstructured models do not. Typically, structured biomass models are represented as either (1) continuous biofilm on the solid surface [182,183] or (2) discontinuous patchy film [123,175,187]. As discussed by Baveye and Valocchi [142], there has been perhaps too much emphasis on making the distinction between the two kinds of models rather than focusing on the fundamental transport and reaction processes that apply to the biofilm system (the early debate regarding the appropriateness of the various conceptual models is reflected in the exchanges of [141,142,157,186]).…”
Section: Conceptual and Mathematical Representation Of Subsurface Biomentioning
confidence: 99%