2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10091133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofouling Formation and Bacterial Community Structure in Hybrid Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor-Membrane Bioreactors: Influence of Salinity Concentration

Abstract: Two pilot-scale hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactors were operated in parallel for the treatment of salinity-amended urban wastewater under 6 hours of hydraulic retention time and 2500 mg L−1 total solids concentration. Two salinity conditions were tested: the constant salinity of 6.5 mS cm−1 electric conductivity (3.6 g L−1 NaCl) and the tidal-like variable salinity with maximum 6.5 mS cm−1 electric conductivity. An investigation was developed on the biofouling produced on the ultrafiltratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the aforementioned results, it becomes evident that, upon introduction of TOPW, a drastic shift in the prokaryotes and eukaryotes present takes place; the organisms naturally present in TOPW and its specific chemical composition seem to exert a major pressure on the bio-community dynamics [50]. Such kind of shifts in wastewater treatment plants have already been described for other environmental factors, such as temperature [24] or salinity [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…From the aforementioned results, it becomes evident that, upon introduction of TOPW, a drastic shift in the prokaryotes and eukaryotes present takes place; the organisms naturally present in TOPW and its specific chemical composition seem to exert a major pressure on the bio-community dynamics [50]. Such kind of shifts in wastewater treatment plants have already been described for other environmental factors, such as temperature [24] or salinity [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In the 'classical' MBR design, the configuration can generally have a submerged or side-stream membrane using external recirculation. Currently, novel changes have been implemented in the classical MBR designs to adhere to more restrictive legislation [99][100][101]. There are several ways to remove the phenolic compounds contained in wastewater by diverse membrane bioreactor configurations [11], including the moving-bed bioreactor (MBBR) [100,102], the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A 2 O) membrane reactor [25], the two-phase partitioning membrane bioreactor [101], or the few novel designs with photocatalysis, using material coupled to the MBBR [103].…”
Section: Membrane Bioreactor Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mancuso et al [103] coupled a TiO 2 -based-photocatalyst that was doped with Fe and/or Cr with an MBBR. They emphasized the difficulties arising from OMWW treatment using only MBR technology due to the short membrane lifetimes, biofouling clogging, and high operational costs [99,104]. Therefore, they proposed a preliminary photocatalysis treatment driven by solar UV in presence of a TiO 2 semiconductor and metal elements to save energy and solve the limitations given by the energy required for the operation.…”
Section: Membrane Bioreactor Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, AGS has a high biomass retention capacity, making it possible to treat large amounts of inflow in a smaller bioreactor relative to other technologies such as CAS because, as mentioned before, the surface in contact with raw water is greater [11]. Some research has reported a concentration of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) close to 10 g L −1 [6], while in CAS technology this usually ranges from 2.5 to 4.5 g L −1 [30].…”
Section: (B) Excellent Settleabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%