1987
DOI: 10.1017/s0094837300008605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biogeographic control of trilobite mass extinction at an Upper Cambrian “biomere” boundary

Abstract: Extinctions at the top of the Sunwaptan Stage (=“Ptychaspid Biomere”) near the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary eliminated about half of North American trilobite families. The families that extend from the shelf into the upper slope show significantly higher survival than those confined to the shelf. Biofacies and lithofacies distribution patterns indicate that the extinctions cannot be attributed to a shelfwide physical environmental perturbation, such as a fall in water temperature or the spread of anoxic waters… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6; Aporrhais, Maa = 4, Pal = 4), whereas two However, the shape of the distribution were narrow ranging (i.e., occupying three changed markedly following the Maastricht-or fewer geographic divisions: Dicroloma, Maa ian extinction, with the Paleocene fauna con-= 1, Pal = 2; Strufhiochenopus, Maa = 1, Pal = taining roughly equal proportions of broad-1). No geographic data were available for the (Bretsky 1973;Fortey 1983;Jablonski 1986Jablonski , 1989Westrop & Ludvigsen 1987), the difference between widespread and restricted genera is not statistically significant (G-test, 0.1 > p > 0.05). However, given the small number of genera involved in the present study, the power of statistical tests is suspect and hence the survivorship pattern documented should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6; Aporrhais, Maa = 4, Pal = 4), whereas two However, the shape of the distribution were narrow ranging (i.e., occupying three changed markedly following the Maastricht-or fewer geographic divisions: Dicroloma, Maa ian extinction, with the Paleocene fauna con-= 1, Pal = 2; Strufhiochenopus, Maa = 1, Pal = taining roughly equal proportions of broad-1). No geographic data were available for the (Bretsky 1973;Fortey 1983;Jablonski 1986Jablonski , 1989Westrop & Ludvigsen 1987), the difference between widespread and restricted genera is not statistically significant (G-test, 0.1 > p > 0.05). However, given the small number of genera involved in the present study, the power of statistical tests is suspect and hence the survivorship pattern documented should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The base Stairsian extinction likely resulted from ecological factors triggered in part by spread of anoxic and/or dysoxic water and possibly sea-level-related habitat destruction in the outer shelf (Westrop and Ludvigsen, 1987). Consistent with the observation that the positive d 13 C excursion was initiated just below the base Stairsian sequence boundary ( 3), multiple carbon cycle drivers in addition to sea level are likely superimposed to produce the complex signal (e.g., changes in ocean circulation and ventilation or weathering fluxes); this could also explain why some large Ordovician sea-level changes (e.g., basal Stonehenge transgression; Miller et al, 2003;Taylor et al, 2012;Landing et al, 2012) are not associated with isotopic excursions or extinctions.…”
Section: Sea-level Driver?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extinction events at stage or "biomere" (biostratigraphic unit) boundaries (Stitt, 1983;Palmer, 1984;Westrop and Ludvigsen, 1987;Taylor et al, 2012) occurred at least 5 times over the ~20 m.y. of the Furongian to mid-Early Ordovician (Tremadocian Stage) (Adrain et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide further evidence for shifts in biogeographic and environmental distribution during Cambrian trilobite and agnostoid extinction events (e.g., Ludvigsen and Westrop, 1983;Westrop and Ludvigsen, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%