2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biogeography of Chilean charophytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern charophytes are typical inhabitants of freshwater (non‐marine) environments, but a few can tolerate some salinity, though they are not suited to grow in an open marine environment (Schubert, Marquardt, Schories, & Blindow, 2015; Vicente et al, 2019; Vicente, Expósito, et al, 2016; Vicente, Villalba‐Breva, et al, 2016; Villalba‐Breva & Martín‐Closas, 2011, 2013). They flourish in almost all inland waters, particularly in slow‐flowing rivers and streams, and lake and pond bottoms (temporary and permanent), and are able to live in sand and silt substrates, and marl‐rich lacustrine environments (Barbosa, Lefler, Berthold, & Laughinghouse, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern charophytes are typical inhabitants of freshwater (non‐marine) environments, but a few can tolerate some salinity, though they are not suited to grow in an open marine environment (Schubert, Marquardt, Schories, & Blindow, 2015; Vicente et al, 2019; Vicente, Expósito, et al, 2016; Vicente, Villalba‐Breva, et al, 2016; Villalba‐Breva & Martín‐Closas, 2011, 2013). They flourish in almost all inland waters, particularly in slow‐flowing rivers and streams, and lake and pond bottoms (temporary and permanent), and are able to live in sand and silt substrates, and marl‐rich lacustrine environments (Barbosa, Lefler, Berthold, & Laughinghouse, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used determination keys (Wood andImahori 1965, Gollerbah andKrasavina 1983;Krause 1997;Schubert and Blindow 2004; Urbaniak and Gąbka 2014; Mouronval et al 2015;etc.) use a set of morphological traits such as cortication, length and number of spine cells, length of stipulodes and bract cells, as well as sex differentiation, to differentiate Chara species. Our results, together with earlier studies, have shown that all these traits vary within genetically homogeneous groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably related to the biology of the species, which is found periodically in ephemeral sites and is often not recorded every year, as, for example, in the case of Kotlice. In most of the red lists of protected species, T. intricata has an endangered status [25][26][27][28] and is considered a very rare species [29]. It must also be remembered that the other species belonging to the genus Tolypella are also rare [11]: T. glomerata Leonh.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%