2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25891-6_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BioLCNet: Reward-Modulated Locally Connected Spiking Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest test accuracy of our proposed model, obtained by optimizing the hyperparameters including the adaptive LIF neurons threshold voltage increase, membrane time constant, and threshold voltage of simple and adaptive LIF neurons relative to their resting and reset voltages, was 87.84% on the MNIST dataset. This accuracy represents an improvement compared to the previous similar work in [21]. Our proposed model, indicated by the red box in the table, shows a comparison with its spike-based counterpart.…”
Section: ]Mv Adaptation Threshold Voltage Increment θPlusmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The highest test accuracy of our proposed model, obtained by optimizing the hyperparameters including the adaptive LIF neurons threshold voltage increase, membrane time constant, and threshold voltage of simple and adaptive LIF neurons relative to their resting and reset voltages, was 87.84% on the MNIST dataset. This accuracy represents an improvement compared to the previous similar work in [21]. Our proposed model, indicated by the red box in the table, shows a comparison with its spike-based counterpart.…”
Section: ]Mv Adaptation Threshold Voltage Increment θPlusmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The performance of the proposed approach was evaluated on MNIST, by working on the threshold voltage increase of adaptive LIF neurons, as well as the membrane time constant and voltage threshold of simple and adaptive LIF neurons in comparison to their resting voltage and reset values in the network, and a recognition accuracy of 87.84% was achieved on the test set. Simulation results demonstrate the improved accuracy of this network compared to a similar SNN in [21]. Also, the efficient mapping of the model to the neuromorphic hardware is feasible because adjusting the voltage reduces the convergence time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations