1991
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.90-1519502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biologic markers in risk assessment for environmental carcinogens

Abstract: The potential of biologic markers to provide more timely and precise risk assessments for environmental carcinogens is viewed against the current state-of-the-art in biological monitoring/molecular epidemiology. Biologic markers such as carcinogen-DNA adducts and oncogene activation are currently considered valid qualitative indicators of potential risk, but for most chemical exposures research is needed to establish their validity as quantitative predictors of cancer risk. Biologic markers have, however, alre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, newly developed biological markers of exposure and early lesion have been increasingly applied in epidemiologic studies in order to overcome problems of statistical power in detecting minor excesses in carcinogenic risk and to better characterize and quantify the relevant exposures [see, e.g., IARC, 1988;Perera, 1988;Perera et al, 1991;Sorsa et al, 19921. In particular, DNA-PAH adducts and adducts of related agents have been successfully employed in the assessment of exposure among foundry workers in Finland [Phillips et al, 19881, coke workers in Poland [Hemminki et al, 1990a1, and humans environmentally exposed to aromatic compounds in Poland [Hemminki et al, 1990bl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, newly developed biological markers of exposure and early lesion have been increasingly applied in epidemiologic studies in order to overcome problems of statistical power in detecting minor excesses in carcinogenic risk and to better characterize and quantify the relevant exposures [see, e.g., IARC, 1988;Perera, 1988;Perera et al, 1991;Sorsa et al, 19921. In particular, DNA-PAH adducts and adducts of related agents have been successfully employed in the assessment of exposure among foundry workers in Finland [Phillips et al, 19881, coke workers in Poland [Hemminki et al, 1990a1, and humans environmentally exposed to aromatic compounds in Poland [Hemminki et al, 1990bl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, adduct frequency can be employed as a useful biomarker along the continuum from exposure to pathophysiologic outcome (3,4). Moreover, it has become increasingly clear that the frequency of stable, promutagenic DNA adducts in a target tissue may also have a role in facilitating risk assessment of mutagenic carcinogens in environmental and occupational settings and, as such, DNA adduct analysis has become an essential tool in molecular epidemiology (5,6). However, since regulatory decisions are based on mutagenic activity and induced mutation frequency (MF), rather than DNA damage and adduct frequency, there is ongoing debate regarding the utility of adduct frequency metrics in a health and disease risk context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies on the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) DNA adducts in white blood cells of smokers and nonsmokers, in general, large interindividual variations were found and the identity of the adducts was not clear [Perera et al, 1991;Phillips et al, 1986Phillips et al, , 1990aStich and Dunn, 19881. Studies performed with specific white blood cell populations have also produced conflicting results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%