1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70016-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biologic pollution in infant bedding in New Zealand: High allergen exposure during a vulnerable period☆☆☆★★★

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, measurements of PEF are not interchangeable with other measurements of lung function, such as FEV1 in adults [30] or children [31], because values obtained with different peak flow meters vary and the range of predicted values is too wide. PEF measurements are also very effort dependent, and quality may be poor.…”
Section: Measurements Of Lung Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measurements of PEF are not interchangeable with other measurements of lung function, such as FEV1 in adults [30] or children [31], because values obtained with different peak flow meters vary and the range of predicted values is too wide. PEF measurements are also very effort dependent, and quality may be poor.…”
Section: Measurements Of Lung Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dust samples were obtained from mattresses and analyzed as described previously. 16,18 The severity of wheezing in the last 12 months was assessed and scored by using 3 measures: the number of attacks of wheezing was scored from 1 to 4 as none (1), 1 to 3 (2), 4 to 12 (3), and greater than 12 (4); the frequency of sleep disturbance was scored from 1 to 3 as never (1), less than 1 night weekly (2), and 1 or more nights weekly (3); and the occurrence of breathlessness severe enough to limit speech was scored from 1 to 2 as no (1) and yes (2). The questionnaire also included questions on pet exposure both currently and during the first year of life, as well as the question, ''Have you ever made a decision to avoid or remove cats from the house because your child had asthma or other allergic problems?''…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 60% of children live with a cat, and even in houses without a cat, the mean levels of Fel d 1 were still significant (ie, approximately 3.2 mg/g dust). 17,18 The purpose of our study was (1) to determine whether there is a true difference between the response to these 2 allergens on the basis of the prevalence and titer of IgE antibody, as well as the presence of IgG and IgG4 antibody to purified allergens, and (2) to investigate how these responses relate to wheezing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are, however, likely to be orders of magnitude less than in Australasia. For example, we have shown geometric mean house dust mite allergen (Der p 1) levels of 83 µg·m −2 in the sheepskin bedding of 15 month-old infants and 35 µg·m −2 in non-sheepskin bedding in New Zealand [10]. This compares with a median level of 0.223 µg·m −2 at 18 months in infant bedding from five German cities in the MAS (Multicentre Allergy Study) study [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…But these furs will probably have been highly treated and sterilised and have few traces of the farmyard by the time they are used by infants. Furthermore, sheepskins have been previously found to harbour large quantities of house dust mite allergen [10], and in some studies sleeping on them in infancy has been shown to be a significant independent risk factor for the development of asthma and wheezing [11]. However, this discrepancy can probably be easily put to bed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%