2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological accelerator mass spectrometry at Uppsala University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of the contamination, depending on the system, is typically between 1 and 10 mg C per sample depending on the specific laboratory contamination level, routines, etc. Secondly, small samples produce lower secondary ion currents than standard samples, 16 and this affects the measurement precision detrimentally. One of the parameters in an AMS experiment that is often optimized is the ion current produced by the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The amount of the contamination, depending on the system, is typically between 1 and 10 mg C per sample depending on the specific laboratory contamination level, routines, etc. Secondly, small samples produce lower secondary ion currents than standard samples, 16 and this affects the measurement precision detrimentally. One of the parameters in an AMS experiment that is often optimized is the ion current produced by the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that for large samples above a few hundred mg of carbon the current is constant at about 1000 nA which is typical for a standard sample in our laboratory. Data for large samples in the 1-10 mg range is not presented as it is well established that large samples have stable current output, independent of sample mass (see, e.g., 16 ). As the sample size is reduced, the current decreases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sample preparation was performed as described previously. [9][10][11] Briefly, the samples collected from the animal study were lyophilized (Scanvac Modulespin 40, Scanlaf A/S, Denmark) for 2 h at 2000 rpm at 10 -3 mbar vacuum and were subsequently placed in quartz tubes C for 3 h to produce CO 2 gas. The gas was cryogenically transferred in vacuum to vials containing 80 mg zinc powder as reducing agent + 2 mg iron powder as catalyst.…”
Section: Ams Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%