2002
DOI: 10.1080/13921657.2002.10512530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological and Genetic Peculiarities of Cross-Composed and Aboriginal Beaver Populations in Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our study, it was shown that delayed dispersal could lead to an increased LRS in male Siberian jays (Ekman et al, 1999) and to an increased probability of reproduction in male red wolves (Sparkman et al, 2010). Generally, the annual reproductive success in our study area was very low compared to other Eurasian beaver populations (Halley, 2011;Saveljev & Milishnikov, 2002). This might be due to resource depletion as beavers inhabited the area at least since 1920 (Olstad, 1937) and because the population is saturated (Campbell et al, 2012;Steyaert et al, 2015).…”
Section: Lifetime Reproductive Successsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Similar to our study, it was shown that delayed dispersal could lead to an increased LRS in male Siberian jays (Ekman et al, 1999) and to an increased probability of reproduction in male red wolves (Sparkman et al, 2010). Generally, the annual reproductive success in our study area was very low compared to other Eurasian beaver populations (Halley, 2011;Saveljev & Milishnikov, 2002). This might be due to resource depletion as beavers inhabited the area at least since 1920 (Olstad, 1937) and because the population is saturated (Campbell et al, 2012;Steyaert et al, 2015).…”
Section: Lifetime Reproductive Successsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…2005). Nevertheless, reintroduced populations of beavers in Russia, of mixed Pripet and Voronezh stock origin, show a considerably higher average litter size, 3.4, than stocks from only one of these refugia, whether living in the refugium (2.8 and 2.9) or reintroduced elsewhere (2.9 and 3.0; Saveljev & Milishnikov 2002). Unmixed stocks from western refugia show a similar pattern: beavers from the Elbe have an average litter of 1.9 kits (Nolet et al.…”
Section: Inbreeding Fecundity and Genetic Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the introduced North American beaver C. canadensis population of the Obor and Ussuri rivers in the Russian Far East derives from a repeatedly bottlenecked population. Dental abnormalities (Saveljev 2001, Saveljev & Milishnikov 2002) are extremely common: 15% of beavers have fewer, and 7% have more than the normal number of teeth, and 30% have tooth caries and gum abnormalities. Defects of the jaws and teeth are relatively easy to detect; it is likely that other, less evident, abnormalities also occur with heightened frequency in unmixed stocks.…”
Section: Inbreeding Fecundity and Genetic Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halley states that the work of Saveljev and Milishnikov (2002) suggests that the differences in litter size observed between ‘mixed’ and ‘unmixed’ populations are due to inbreeding. Fecundity in the North American beaver C. canadensis is affected by many factors, including e.g.…”
Section: Inbreeding Fecundity and Genetic Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2006). Saveljev and Milishnikov (2002) provide figures for average litter size (see their Table 1). However, the method(s) used to determine litter size are not stated, and a statistical analysis of the differences in mean values is not presented.…”
Section: Inbreeding Fecundity and Genetic Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%