2017
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo3042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological and physical influences on marine snowfall at the equator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
95
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gravitational settling of particles from the euphotic zone to the deep ocean plays an important role in controlling the ocean's carbon cycle (Armstrong et al, 2001;Son et al, 2009;Alonso-González et al, 2010;Kiko et al, 2017). Particles sinking rapidly enough to reach significant depths before being degraded or solubilized also contribute to the biological pump Passow and Carlson, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gravitational settling of particles from the euphotic zone to the deep ocean plays an important role in controlling the ocean's carbon cycle (Armstrong et al, 2001;Son et al, 2009;Alonso-González et al, 2010;Kiko et al, 2017). Particles sinking rapidly enough to reach significant depths before being degraded or solubilized also contribute to the biological pump Passow and Carlson, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the effect of the active transport is to redistribute particulate organic carbon between the subsurface and the migration depth. Therefore, the active transport of carbon decreases the concentration of particles in the subsurface while increasing it deeper than~500 m. Those characteristic profiles have noticeably been observed in equatorial regions by Kiko et al (2017). Interestingly, in M60, the amount of big particles can even be higher at the migration depth, than in the subsurface layer.…”
Section: Regional Analysis Of the Active Transport Effectmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Some early studies reported that SPOM decreased with depth, with low concentrations in deep water (Altabet, ; Sheridan et al, ), but more recent studies have documented high concentrations of slow‐sinking particles at bathypelagic depths in the Atlantic and western equatorial Pacific (Kiko et al, ). Studies in the subtropical North Atlantic found that the average concentration of buoyant particulate organic carbon showed no discernable decrease with depth and that the concentration of these particles was approximately 1 to 2 orders of magnitude greater than the concentration of fast‐sinking particles (Baltar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source of these deep buoyant and slow‐sinking particles remains unclear. Some, at least, may be the remnants of fast‐sinking particles that were fragmented at depth by swimming zooplankton (Cavan et al, 2017; Dilling & Alldredge, ; Giering et al, ; Kiko et al, ). Deep‐sea scleractinian corals, with carbonate‐bound organic nitrogen δ 15 N values consistently 8–9‰ higher than the δ 15 N of fast‐sinking particles, have been suggested to primarily feed on buoyant particles that are possibly derived from fast‐sinking particles (Wang et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%