Biological collections and ecological/environmental research: a review, some observations and a look to the future

Abstract

Housed worldwide, mostly in museums and herbaria, is a vast collection of biological specimens developed over centuries. These biological collections, and associated taxonomic and systematic research, have received considerable long-term public support. The work remaining in systematics has been expanding as the estimated total number of species of organisms on Earth has risen over recent decades, as have estimated numbers of undescribed species. Despite this increasing task, support for taxonomic and systematic research, and biological collections upon which such research is based, has declined over the last 30-40 years, while other areas of biological research have grown considerably, especially those that focus on environmental issues. Reflecting increases in research that deals with ecological questions (e.g. what determines species distribution and abundance) or environmental issues (e.g. toxic pollution), the level of research attempting to use biological collections in museums or herbaria in an ecological/environmental context has risen dramatically during about the last 20 years. The perceived relevance of biological collections, and hence the support they receive, should be enhanced if this trend continues and they are used prominently regarding such environmental issues as anthropogenic loss of biodiversity and associated ecosystem function, global climate change, and decay of the epidemiological environment. It is unclear, however, how best to use biological collections in the context of such ecological/environmental issues or how best to manage collections to facilitate such use. We demonstrate considerable and increasingly realized potential for research based on biological collections to contribute to ecological/environmental understanding. However, because biological collections were not originally intended for use regarding such issues and have inherent biases and limitations, they are proving more useful in some contexts than in others. Biological collections have, for example, been particularly useful as sources of information regarding variation in attributes of individuals (e.g. morphology, chemical composition) in relation to environmental variables, and provided important information in relation to species' distributions, but less useful in the contexts of habitat associations and population sizes. Changes to policies, strategies and procedures associated with biological collections could mitigate these biases and limitations, and hence make such collections more useful in the context of ecological/environmental issues. Haphazard and opportunistic collecting could be replaced with strategies for adding to existing collections that prioritize projects that use biological collections and include, besides taxonomy and systematics, a focus on significant environmental/ecological issues. Other potential changes include increased recording of the nature and extent of collecting effort and information associated with each specimen such as nearby habitat and other individuals observed but not collec...

Diversity of Wild Palms (Arecaceae) in the Republic of Benin: Finding the Gaps in the National Inventory Combining Field and Digital Accessible Knowledge

“…In addition, wild palms are recognizably distinct species, with little room for identification error: the species have long been described and few taxonomic misidentifications have been reported. As such, taxonomic bias is not likely to have affected the inventory, contrary to situations for other taxa (Soberón et al 2000;Pyke and Ehrlich 2010).…”

Online image databases as multi-purpose resources: discovery of a new host ant of Rickia wasmannii Cavara (Ascomycota, Laboulbeniales) by screening AntWeb.org

“…These biological collections could be important to reveal new geographical distributions of several species (Ponder et al 2001, Suarez and Tsutsui 2004, Solow and Roberts 2006, Pyke and Ehrlich 2010. Examining biological samples in these collections may also reveal previously unrecorded associations between different species (Frey et al 1992), e.g.…”

“…Natural history collections experienced a decline in funding in the last decade with growing concern over the vast potential of biological information waiting to be uncovered from these resources (Pyke and Ehrlich 2010). On the other hand, digitization of conserved material and the possibility to remotely access an ever-growing number of high resolution photographs from collections around the globe has opened up previously unimaginable possibilities (e.g.…”

La collection de mammifères du Musée canadien de la nature : 100e anniversaire en 2012

“…Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. www.erudit.org Tous droits réservés © La Société Provancher d'histoire naturelle du Canada, 2013 Introduction Les musées d'histoire naturelle et d'autres institutions scientifiques à travers le monde, tels les centres de recherche, les universités et les agences gouvernementales, préservent un nombre important de spécimens ; de 1 à 3 milliards selon différentes estimations (Ariño, 2010 ;Pyke et Ehrlich, 2010). Un spécimen représente un organisme ou un individu concretsoit au complet, soit en partie -d'une population et représente donc un point d'échantillonnage spatiotemporel unique.…”

“…(1982) ont énuméré 4 170 espèces de mammifères récents reconnus que comptait la planète. Avec l'augmentation du nombre d'études en systématique des mammifères, l'avènement des nouvelles techniques de biologie moléculaire et l'exploration de régions qui étaient jusqu'à récemment inaccessibles aux scientifiques (Reeder et collab., 2007), ce nombre a été revu et porté à 4 629 en 1993 (Wilson et Reeder, 1993) et à 5 416 au cours de la décennie 2000 (Wilson et Reeder, 2005 biodiversité, le suivi de l'état de l'environnement, la génétique des populations, mais aussi en agriculture ainsi qu'en médecine humaine et vétérinaire (Chapman, 2005 ;Pyke et Ehrlich, 2010). À ce propos, Boakes et collab.…”