2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological control of intolerant hardwood competition: Silvicultural efficacy of Chondrostereum purpureum and worker productivity in conifer plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pouzar have been generally successful but variable (Myketa et al 1995, Pitt et al 1999a, Conlin et al 2000, De Jong 2000, Shamoun 2000, Uotila et al 2006. Roy et al (2010) observed that after four years, addition of a C. purpureum-based biological treatment does not significantly improve light availability and morphological parameters (height, diameter) of white spruce seedlings and thereby does not eliminate the need for repeated mechanical treatments. C. purpureum is currently registered for use only on Sitka and red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.)…”
Section: Application Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pouzar have been generally successful but variable (Myketa et al 1995, Pitt et al 1999a, Conlin et al 2000, De Jong 2000, Shamoun 2000, Uotila et al 2006. Roy et al (2010) observed that after four years, addition of a C. purpureum-based biological treatment does not significantly improve light availability and morphological parameters (height, diameter) of white spruce seedlings and thereby does not eliminate the need for repeated mechanical treatments. C. purpureum is currently registered for use only on Sitka and red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.)…”
Section: Application Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yet, pin cherry (Prunus pensylvanica L. f.) seems to be another resistant species to C. purpureum as only 17% of the treated stumps were dead one year after the fungus treatment (Wall, 1990). For small-diameter paper birch, trembling aspen, and pin cherry stumps mortality is lower than mentioned above (Roy et al, 2010). However, the number of living stumps generally continues to decrease for two to four years after the treatment (Roy et al, 2010;Vartiamäki et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It infects live trees, for example cultivated fruit ones and wild ones, causing bark necrosis (killing bark and cambium), and silver-leaf disease (de Jong et al 1990;Domański 1991;Butin 1995;de Jong 2000;Agrios 2005;Bailey and Mupondwa 2006). It is used for production of bioherbicide used to prevent the generation of sprouts in deciduous trees, among them Prunus serotina (i.e., Gosselin et al 1999;de Jong 2000;Becker et al 2005;Roy et al 2010). Towards the end of 1980s, it was found that after applying suspension containing mycelium of C. purpureum on cut stumps of black cherry, close to 90% of them died (Scheepens and Hoogerbrugge 1989).…”
Section: Colonization By Macrofungi On Mechanically Eliminated Black mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wojewoda 2003; Karasiński et al 2015). Fungus Chondrostereum purpureum is an exception as it is used in Western Europe for biological elimination of undesirable deciduous species, including black cherry (e.g., Van den Meersschaut and Lust 1997;de Jong 2000;Roy et al 2010). However, there are known observations, including those in the protection district Rózin of the KPN, where spontaneous occurrence of wood decaying fungi was confirmed (Namura-Ochalska and Borowa 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%