2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological denitrification from mature landfill leachate using a food-waste-derived carbon source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the co-substrate may have played an important role in pollution removal as reported elsewhere [23,27]. Despite the lower biodegradation kinetics of the allochthonous biomass, the high hydraulic retention time in the SBRs (5 d) could have favored similar removal performances in both reactors [28].…”
Section: Cod Removal Performancementioning
confidence: 71%
“…In particular, the co-substrate may have played an important role in pollution removal as reported elsewhere [23,27]. Despite the lower biodegradation kinetics of the allochthonous biomass, the high hydraulic retention time in the SBRs (5 d) could have favored similar removal performances in both reactors [28].…”
Section: Cod Removal Performancementioning
confidence: 71%
“…Essential to the nutrient removal process is the C/N ratio as it can often dictate the amount of remaining nitrogen in the effluent. In Yan, et al, (2018), is was discovered that with a C/N ratio of 7 and a temperature of 25 o C, the general discharge standards could be met for nitrogen and COD content in effluents that were to be discharged into Chinese wastewater streams of watercourses in the region. This is quite similar to what was determined in where it was determined that the optimal C/N ratio and temperature was 6 and 25 o C respectively.…”
Section: Biological Nutrient Removal (Bnr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributed to the fact that using sodium acetate as a carbon source only provides that waste with a singular compound and there are various types of bacteria within the reactor. Using different waste streams as a source for the nutrient removal provides the bacteria with alternatives to acetate that may be more favoured, thus engaging all bacteria and making them active instead of one particular type (Yan, et al, 2018). This would imply that using various fermentative liquids may have a beneficial reaction and actually work to increase the efficiency and productivity of a general reactor (Guo, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Biological Nutrient Removal (Bnr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the most commonly used biological method in industrial wastewater treatment plants is still a conventional activated sludge process that involves autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification [13][14][15]. The stability of this process and the treatment outcome depend on the microbial community structure, the amount of functional groups belong to the activated sludge (denitrifiers, nitrifiers, heterotrophic microorganisms), their activity (Nitrate Utilization Rate-NUR, Ammonia Utilization Rate-AUR, Oxygen Utilization Rate-OUR), and the ratio of AOB (Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria) to NOB (Nitrite-Oxidizing Bacteria) [14,16,17], while the microbial activity is influenced by operating parameters, such as pH, temperature, and oxygen concentration as well as the nitrogen and COD loading rate and COD/TN ratio in the influent [1,13,15,18]. The increase in biological nitrogen removal efficiency in wastewater with a low COD/TN ratio can be achieved by adding an external carbon source [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of this process and the treatment outcome depend on the microbial community structure, the amount of functional groups belong to the activated sludge (denitrifiers, nitrifiers, heterotrophic microorganisms), their activity (Nitrate Utilization Rate-NUR, Ammonia Utilization Rate-AUR, Oxygen Utilization Rate-OUR), and the ratio of AOB (Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria) to NOB (Nitrite-Oxidizing Bacteria) [14,16,17], while the microbial activity is influenced by operating parameters, such as pH, temperature, and oxygen concentration as well as the nitrogen and COD loading rate and COD/TN ratio in the influent [1,13,15,18]. The increase in biological nitrogen removal efficiency in wastewater with a low COD/TN ratio can be achieved by adding an external carbon source [18]. The most frequently used carbon sources are easily biodegradable organics, such as ethanol [19,20], methanol [20][21][22] and acetic acid [15,20,21,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%