2016
DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1256531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological differences that distinguish the 2 major stages of wound healing in potato tubers

Abstract: The two stages of potato tuber wound healing, closing layer formation (CLF) and wound periderm formation (WPF), have critical biological differences. The first stage, CLF, involves early induction of DNA synthesis and nuclear division in the absence of cell division. The transition phase from CLF to the second stage, WPF, is marked by a transient decrease in expression of suberin-specific genes. The second stage involves cell division. Although biologically active cytokinins (CKs) are not present in quantifiab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted in the Introduction, wound healing to restore the chemical and physical barriers in fruits and tubers is a complex process that proceeds in distinct steps. To compare the wound healing time course in WT and FHT -silenced tubers, we undertook parallel studies of polar and non-polar soluble metabolites along with polymeric solid composites at four key time points: immediately after wounding (day 0), when a closing layer has formed (day 3), when a new wound periderm is nascent (day 7), and when the new periderm has developed but is still immature (day 14) (Lulai, et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in the Introduction, wound healing to restore the chemical and physical barriers in fruits and tubers is a complex process that proceeds in distinct steps. To compare the wound healing time course in WT and FHT -silenced tubers, we undertook parallel studies of polar and non-polar soluble metabolites along with polymeric solid composites at four key time points: immediately after wounding (day 0), when a closing layer has formed (day 3), when a new wound periderm is nascent (day 7), and when the new periderm has developed but is still immature (day 14) (Lulai, et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the first studies were mainly descriptive ( Bloch, 1941 ; Lipetz, 1970 ), in the last decades, molecular mechanisms are increasingly becoming clear ( LeĂłn et al, 2001 ; Maffei et al, 2007a ; Savatin et al, 2014 ). For information on wound healing and mitigation of damage in post-harvest processes in vegetables and fruit, we refer to specific literature ( Cisneros-Zevallos et al, 2014 ; Lulai et al, 2016 ; Saltveit, 2016 ; Iakimova and Woltering, 2018 ; Hussein et al, 2020 ). This review provides a broad overview of the recent developments in molecular mechanisms with a focus on spatiotemporal dynamics in order to gain mechanistic understanding and to address open questions in the field of wound response in plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid development of wound periderm is critical to minimize subsequent weight loss or disease spread [6,7]. Wound periderm formation is initiated when cell division increases and suberin deposition occurs in response to wounding [8][9][10]. The primary role of suberin is to serve as a barrier to both water loss and microbial infection [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%