2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-008-0291-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological effective dose evaluation in gynaecological brachytherapy: LDR and HDR treatments, dependence on radiobiological parameters, and treatment optimisation

Abstract: The efficacy of a treatment may vary as a result of several factors. Customised radiobiological evaluation is a useful adjunct to clinical evaluation in planning equivalent treatments that satisfy all dosimetric constraints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in figure 4, a large portion of 169 Yb's electron and photon fluence spectra is below 1 keV in energy; by using a high cut-off, these particles were not transported and thus the differences in RBE as a function of source proximity was not seen in their work. Additionally, the work Currently, the prevalence of RBE-weighting in the treatment planning process is not ubiquitous despite numerous suggestions in literature [6,7,10,18,19,30,32,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. Contrary to previous works, this study sought to determine how RBE changed as a function of distance from the source and the resulting impact on a treatment plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in figure 4, a large portion of 169 Yb's electron and photon fluence spectra is below 1 keV in energy; by using a high cut-off, these particles were not transported and thus the differences in RBE as a function of source proximity was not seen in their work. Additionally, the work Currently, the prevalence of RBE-weighting in the treatment planning process is not ubiquitous despite numerous suggestions in literature [6,7,10,18,19,30,32,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. Contrary to previous works, this study sought to determine how RBE changed as a function of distance from the source and the resulting impact on a treatment plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the prevalence of RBE-weighting in the treatment planning process is not ubiquitous despite numerous suggestions in literature. 24,77,78,88,89,101,103,[114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123] Contrary to previous works, this study sought to determine how RBE changed as a function of distance from the source and the resulting impact on a treatment plan. In contradiction to 125 I, the RBE M of 192 Ir and 169 Yb was found to increase with distance away from the source by approximately 3% and 7%, respectively, at 8 cm (Figure 4.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters used for calculations have been chosen in agreement with existing literature [8, 12, 17]. Generic values of 10 Gy and 3 Gy have been assumed for the fractionation sensitivities of tumors and normal tissues, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%