2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00734-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological effects of embedded depleted uranium (DU): summary of Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of uranium on the respiratory system has been widely studied and uranium has been found to cause both non-malignant and malignant lung diseases (Pinkerton et al 2004). Although hepatic toxicity has not been described as a major consequence of uranium exposure in the literature, there is evidence that it may cause liver lesions (McClain et al 2001;Leggett and Pellmar 2003;Craft et al 2004). Previous works on the uranium biological effects have reported alterations to the cytochrome P450 hepatic system (Gueguen et al 2006).…”
Section: Uraniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of uranium on the respiratory system has been widely studied and uranium has been found to cause both non-malignant and malignant lung diseases (Pinkerton et al 2004). Although hepatic toxicity has not been described as a major consequence of uranium exposure in the literature, there is evidence that it may cause liver lesions (McClain et al 2001;Leggett and Pellmar 2003;Craft et al 2004). Previous works on the uranium biological effects have reported alterations to the cytochrome P450 hepatic system (Gueguen et al 2006).…”
Section: Uraniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, growing concern has arisen regarding the DU released from munitions employed in conflict areas, such as the Middle East and Kosovo (Bem and Bou-Rabee, 2004;Jia et al, 2004Jia et al, , 2005Di Lella et al, 2005), as well as weapons testing sites (Bleise et al, 2003;McClain et al, 2001;Oliver et al, 2007Oliver et al, , 2008. While chemical toxicity of natural U is considered to be identical to DU, radiological toxicities are different, since DU emits around 40% less radiation than natural U (Craft et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DU is a by-product of uranium enrichment and has roughly 60-75% of the radioactivity of an equivalent amount of natural uranium (Hindin et al, 2005;Craft et al, 2004) due to the reduction of the percentage of radioactive isotopes ( 234 U and 235 U) from 0.72% and 0.006%, respectively, in natural uranium to 0.2% and 0.001% (McClain et al, 2001). The similarity in chemistry between DU and natural uranium, a chemical whose toxicology has been studied extensively, suggests that DU should exert similar toxic properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%