1972
DOI: 10.1021/jf60180a051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological estimation of available iron using chicks or rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is very close Iron intake, mg/day to the relative biological value reported by Fritz et al (8) and is also very close to the values relative to ferrous sulfate reported by others (3,6). Thus, the expression of the bioavailability of food iron as the efficiency of its conversion into hemoglobin is logical and provides data consistent with more complex procedures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value is very close Iron intake, mg/day to the relative biological value reported by Fritz et al (8) and is also very close to the values relative to ferrous sulfate reported by others (3,6). Thus, the expression of the bioavailability of food iron as the efficiency of its conversion into hemoglobin is logical and provides data consistent with more complex procedures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Most assays of iron bioavailability utilize changes in hemoglobin concentra tion as tire criterion for assessing the quality of the iron source (3,5,8). Such assays are subject to variations in amounts of iron consumed as affected by dietary iron content and/or diet acceptability (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, this variability is dealt with by expressing the hematinic responses of the unknowns relative to ferrous sulfate (Shah et al, 1979;Coccodrilli et al, 1976;Amine et al, 1972). …”
Section: Nutri Ti Onal Bi Oavai Labi LI Ty Of I Ronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slope-ratio assays for iron bioavailability in foods were developed in the 1970s [10][11][12] and adopted as the AOAC official method in 1984 [3]. Slope-ratio assays, however, require a considerably large number of rats and do not give a value for each individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%