2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological ion exchange as an alternative to biological activated carbon for drinking water treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, coagulation/sedimentation/filtration (Zhang et al 2017), biological activated carbon filtration (Liu et al 2020) and ion exchange (Cornelissen et al 2009) are the three most used technologies to removal HA from waters. MIEX resin is a strong base resin with chloride as exchangeable ion, equipped with macro-porous polyacrylic matrix and marketed by Orica Watercare (Ding et al 2012a;Yang et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, coagulation/sedimentation/filtration (Zhang et al 2017), biological activated carbon filtration (Liu et al 2020) and ion exchange (Cornelissen et al 2009) are the three most used technologies to removal HA from waters. MIEX resin is a strong base resin with chloride as exchangeable ion, equipped with macro-porous polyacrylic matrix and marketed by Orica Watercare (Ding et al 2012a;Yang et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research efforts have been conducted to remove these contaminants from water/wastewater using several methods such as adsorption [ 3 , 4 , 5 ], electrolysis [ 6 ], electrodialysis [ 7 ], ion-exchange [ 8 ], reverse osmosis [ 9 ], conventional coagulation [ 10 ], and chemical precipitation [ 11 ]. Many of these methods, such as electrodialysis, electrolysis, ion-exchange, and reverse osmosis, are expensive and cannot be applied in developing countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of that, techno-viable wastewater management techniques need to be developed and implemented, particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) such as South Africa, to address this problem. According to various standards and water quality limits, the proposed level for ammonia and phosphate should be ≤1.5 mg L -1 and ≤10 mg L -1 , respectively, when discharged to the receiving environment, albeit ammonia can be converted into nitrate or nitrite with prescribed limits of ≤11 and ≤0.90 mg L -1 , respectively [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%