Biological management of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.): a review

Azlay, Latifa; Boukhari, Mohammed El Mehdi El; Mayad, El Hassan; Barakate, Mustapha

doi:10.1007/s13165-022-00417-y

Cited by 16 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 166 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some bacterial isolates shown a highly activity against RKNs infected tomato such as Pseudomonas jessenii, P. protegens, Bacillus thuringiensis and Serratia plymuthica. Additionally, some fungal isolates for example Purpureocillium lilacinus, Trichoderma harzianum, Arthrobotrys oligospora, Lecanicillium muscarium Gliocladium spp., Pochonia chlamydosporia and Paecillomyces lilacinus [54][55][56]. Furthermore, some endophytic agents such as Fusarium oxysporum (FO162) can induce systemic resistance against Meloidogyne spp.…”

Section: Biological Control Agentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacting of Root-Knot Nematodes on Tomato: Current Status and Potential Horizons for Its Managing

Youssef Banora

2024

Tomato Cultivation and Consumption - Innovation and Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are very serious pathogen on tomato plants among the worldwide. They are widely distributed in soil and causes a highly economical losses for more than 5000 plant species. Therefore, many managements’ strategies are applicable to decrease their effectiveness such as resistant genotypes, soil solarisation and chemical control. Until now, chemical control is the most applied strategy for nematode management. Although nematicides are highly impacted for nematode suppression but environmentally not safety and very toxic. Consequently, several promising studies revealed that root-knot nematode (RKN) can inhibit nematode reproduction based on the susceptibility of their plant host. The plant effectors play a vital role during nematode infection and effect on plant response to nematode requirements. To understand well the relationship between nematode and their host, the molecular and immunolocalization methods illustrated some proteins which are expressed by plant genes involved in plant–nematode interaction. This chapter will focus on the latest status and future perspectives for nematode management.

show abstract

Section: Biological Control Agentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacting of Root-Knot Nematodes on Tomato: Current Status and Potential Horizons for Its Managing

Youssef Banora

2024

Tomato Cultivation and Consumption - Innovation and Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The realistic risk of propagating plantparasitic nematode can be mitigated by a careful selection of cover crop species that limit or even reduce specific nematode species (Briar et al, 2016;Grubišić et al, 2018;Abd-Elgawad, 2021). Using non-host cover crops in rotation with main crops can help reduce the population of plant-parasitic nematodes in the soil by reducing the number of host plants available for the nematodes to feed on (Azlay et al, 2023). Furthermore, several cover crops are known to cause a decline in the community of PPN, partly (Vervoort et al, 2014) due to the release of secondary metabolites and their toxic derivatives upon nematode attack (Ploeg, 2008;Eugui et al, 2022).…”

Section: Cover Crops Can Impact Pathogens and Pathogens' Antagonistsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First, crop rotation is the practice by which the growing of susceptible plant species is alternated with non-host plants over time. The discontinuous presence of hosts has been shown to effectively reduce the densities of several plant-parasitic nematode species (Azlay et al, 2023). This practise is effective for nematodes feeding on a limited range of plant species only.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here, we focused on the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne chitwoodi, a highly polyphagous obligatory plant parasite that poses a significant threat to crops globally in both temperate and tropical regions (O'Bannon et al, 1982;Azlay et al, 2023). Because of its broad host range, M. chitwoodi cannot be effectively controlled by crop rotation, and although host plant resistances have been identified (Mojtahedi et al, 1995), they have not been introduced yet in commercial varieties of any main crop (Teklu et al, 2023).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Nurturing belowground life: the role of cover crops in shaping soil microbial communities in agroecosystems

Cazzaniga

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cover crops are used in agriculture to minimise soil erosion, prevent nutrient leaching and increase soil organic matter content. Cover crops can also be grown to stimulate the soil microbial community to improve soil biological conditions. Despite their widespread use, little is known about the impact of different cover crop species on the composition and activity of the soil microbiome. Here we investigate the effect of distinct cover crop species on the rhizosphere microbiome and characterise both the resident (ribosomal (r)DNA-based) and the potentially active (rRNA-based) fractions of the bacterial, fungal, protist and metazoan communities in the cover crops rhizosphere. We conducted a field experiment using 70-litre bottomless containers in which we grew ten monocultures of commonly used cover crop species belonging to five plant families, and an unplanted control treatment (fallow). The total DNA and RNA were extracted from soil and the bacterial, fungal, protistan and metazoan communities were characterized using Illumina MiSeq sequencing. We found that all cover crop species significantly impacted the resident and the potentially active microbial communities in their rhizospheres. Cover crops exerted distinct selection strengths on the native microbial communities. For individual cover crops, the impacts on the resident and the potentially active microbial communities differed while showing similar overall tendencies. Oilseed radish (Brassicaceae) was shown to provoke the strongest microbial shifts, in part attributable to a promotion of the bacterial family Pseudomonadaceae and a repression of Microascaceae in the rhizosphere. Lentil (Fabaceae) induced a widespread stimulation of fungal taxa, including Trichocomaceae and fungal members of the Glomerales order, whereas black oat and hybrid ryegrass (both Poaceae) gave rise to relatively mild changes in the soil microbial communities. Analyses of rRNA-based rhizobiome data revealed that, except for phacelia, all cover crops induced an increase in microbial network complexity as compared to the fallow control. Data presented here provide a broad baseline for the effects of cover crops on four organismal groups, which may facilitate future cover crop selection to advance soil health.

show abstract

Fungal Antagonists and their Effectiveness to Manage the Rice Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola

Haque,

Khan,

Zamir

et al. 2024

Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biological management of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.): a review

Cited by 16 publications

References 166 publications

Impacting of Root-Knot Nematodes on Tomato: Current Status and Potential Horizons for Its Managing

Impacting of Root-Knot Nematodes on Tomato: Current Status and Potential Horizons for Its Managing

Nurturing belowground life: the role of cover crops in shaping soil microbial communities in agroecosystems

Fungal Antagonists and their Effectiveness to Manage the Rice Root-knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About