1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007425005491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological reasons for the unsuitability of growth parameters and indices for comparing fish growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Searches were then completed using the same terms but searching for "topic" to provide any additional material that would otherwise have been missed. These criteria were primarily where the value of L ∞ was considered very high or very low for the species in general, suggesting sampling had not been representative of the population (Živkov, Trichkova, & Raikova-Petrova, 1999), or had been subject to high harvest rates (i.e., an anthropogenic pressure that other populations had not been subjected to). Across these studies, data were omitted where the values were considered unreliable or were deemed to be not biologically relevant (Table S1).…”
Section: Growth Rate Comparisons Across the Ranges Of Sander Luciopmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Searches were then completed using the same terms but searching for "topic" to provide any additional material that would otherwise have been missed. These criteria were primarily where the value of L ∞ was considered very high or very low for the species in general, suggesting sampling had not been representative of the population (Živkov, Trichkova, & Raikova-Petrova, 1999), or had been subject to high harvest rates (i.e., an anthropogenic pressure that other populations had not been subjected to). Across these studies, data were omitted where the values were considered unreliable or were deemed to be not biologically relevant (Table S1).…”
Section: Growth Rate Comparisons Across the Ranges Of Sander Luciopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across these studies, data were omitted where the values were considered unreliable or were deemed to be not biologically relevant (Table S1). These criteria were primarily where the value of L ∞ was considered very high or very low for the species in general, suggesting sampling had not been representative of the population (Živkov, Trichkova, & Raikova-Petrova, 1999), or had been subject to high harvest rates (i.e., an anthropogenic pressure that other populations had not been subjected to). Where von Bertalanffy growth model parameters were calculated based on standard or total length, these were converted to fork length using linear models from Copp et al (2003) to enable comparisons to be consistent across studies.…”
Section: Growth Rate Comparisons Across the Ranges Of Sander Luciopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, growth parameters such as K and Ø ′ are used for evaluation of growth performance under a variety of environmental stresses such as under aquaculture conditions (Pauly, 1991; Živkov, Trichkova & Raikova-Petrova, 1999). Quantitative assessment of mortality is also a significant step to improve our understanding of population dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Η εξίσωση του von Bertalanffy δίνεται από τον τύπο (Bertalanffy 1938 1983, Casselman 1987, Moreau 1987, Longhurst & Pauly 1987, Zivkov et al 1999 Τα ανάδρομα υπολογιζόμενα μήκη των πληθυσμών του R. panosi και στα τέσσερα υδάτινα οικοσυστήματα δε διαφέρουν από τα εκτιμώμενα μήκη που προσδιορίστηκαν από την εξίσωση von Bertalanffy.…”
Section: Tl N =α+(Tl C -α)X(r N /R C )unclassified