2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological treatments in giant cell arteritis & Takayasu arteritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1a. NIH scales also significantly decreased between baseline and 6 months of tocilizumab therapy (3 [3][4] at baseline versus 1 [0-2] at 6 months; p < 0.001), as well as ITAS-2010 (5 [2-7] versus 3 [0-8]; p = 0.002), and ITAS-A score (7 [4-10] versus 4 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]; p = 0.0001). Baseline practitioners' subjective scale evaluated that 13 patients (100%) had active TAK, versus 2 patients (15%) after 6 months (p < 0.001) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Efficacy Of Tocilizumab At 6 Monthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1a. NIH scales also significantly decreased between baseline and 6 months of tocilizumab therapy (3 [3][4] at baseline versus 1 [0-2] at 6 months; p < 0.001), as well as ITAS-2010 (5 [2-7] versus 3 [0-8]; p = 0.002), and ITAS-A score (7 [4-10] versus 4 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]; p = 0.0001). Baseline practitioners' subjective scale evaluated that 13 patients (100%) had active TAK, versus 2 patients (15%) after 6 months (p < 0.001) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Efficacy Of Tocilizumab At 6 Monthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid and sustained remission under tocilizumab therapy has been described, notably among patients with refractory TAK [8][9][10][11][12][13]. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as most studies were case reports or small series, and vascular progression under tocilizumab treatment has also been described [8][9][10][11][12][13]. A recent randomized trial failed to demonstrate the benefit of tocilizumab, compared to placebo, on relapse-free survival among patients with refractory TAK [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients undergoing steroid therapy signi cantly decreased between baseline (13 patients, 100%) and 6 months of tocilizumab therapy (6 patients, 54%, p = 0.015), as shown in Figure 1A. NIH scales also signi cantly decreased between baseline and 6 months of tocilizumab therapy (3 [3][4] [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]; p=0.0001). Baseline practitioners' subjective scale evaluated that 13 patients (100%) had active TAK, versus 2 patients (15%) after 6 months (p <0.001) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Rapid and sustained remission under tocilizumab therapy has been described, notably among patients with refractory TAK [8][9][10][11][12][13] . These ndings should be interpreted with caution, as most studies were casereports or small series, and vascular progression under tocilizumab treatment has also been described [8][9][10][11][12][13] . A recent randomized trial failed to demonstrate the bene t of tocilizumab, compared to placebo, on relapse-free survival among patients with refractory TAK 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, some genes associated with TAK are being explored as therapeutic targets for this vasculitis. On one hand, tocilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), has shown clinical efficacy in TAK patients in several case series studies (59). This efficiency was confirmed in a prospective clinical trial evaluating tocilizumab in refractory TAK, although the primary end-point was not met, probably due to the low number of individuals included in this study (60).…”
Section: Contribution Of Genetics To New Therapeutic Approaches In Vamentioning
confidence: 99%