2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological variation of measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that ScysC is a better marker than Scr [7][8][9] and is less affected by muscle mass and nutritional status. Current research confirms that within-subject variability in estimated GFR was lower than measured GFR, which indicates that estimates of GFR are at least as reliable as measured GFR for monitoring patients over time [10]. According to the epidemiology of mGFR in China, China has a large population base, with obvious differences in sex, region and race compared to these parameters in white people [11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have shown that ScysC is a better marker than Scr [7][8][9] and is less affected by muscle mass and nutritional status. Current research confirms that within-subject variability in estimated GFR was lower than measured GFR, which indicates that estimates of GFR are at least as reliable as measured GFR for monitoring patients over time [10]. According to the epidemiology of mGFR in China, China has a large population base, with obvious differences in sex, region and race compared to these parameters in white people [11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In recent reports, the rate of change in biomarkers was shown to be smaller than that in kidney nuclear radiography. The eGFR computed by equations is at least as reliable as the mGFR measured by nuclear medicine for monitoring patients over time [10]. The comparative verification data adopted in this study are more applicable to China's national conditions, and its statistical results have more practical clinical significance.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mgfr and Egfrmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…All methods to estimate GFR are associated with systematic and random error; however, on a positive note, they have less time-to-time variability than measured GFR [ 47 ]. Furthermore, it is important to consider the underlying risk profile of the population on the impact of the relative risk estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the editor: The recent article by Rowe et al 1 found less variation in the longitudinal measured glomerular filtration rate versus estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Not considered in their study are variations in eGFR equations and the method for determining serum creatinine that confounds the interpretation of eGFR results.…”
Section: Variation In Serum Creatinine Methodology and Egfr Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%