2012
DOI: 10.3109/10715762.2012.659248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biologically relevant oxidants and terminology, classification and nomenclature of oxidatively generated damage to nucleobases and 2-deoxyribose in nucleic acids

Abstract: A broad scientific community is involved in investigations aimed at delineating the mechanisms of formation and cellular processing of oxidatively generated damage to nucleic acids. Perhaps as a consequence of this breadth of research expertise, there are nomenclature problems for several of the oxidized bases including 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoGua), a ubiquitous marker of almost every type of oxidative stress in cells. Efforts to standardize the nomenclature and abbreviations of the main DNA degradation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
(206 reference statements)
1
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the highly reactive species peroxynitrite, formed by the near-diffusion limited reaction between nitric oxide and superoxide anion, may also directly oxidize proteins or nitrate tyrosine residues leading to nitrosative stress. Additionally, the formation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG), 2′ a marker of DNA oxidation, was demonstrated to induce mutagenic changes aside from interfering with gene expression (19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Study Design and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the highly reactive species peroxynitrite, formed by the near-diffusion limited reaction between nitric oxide and superoxide anion, may also directly oxidize proteins or nitrate tyrosine residues leading to nitrosative stress. Additionally, the formation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG), 2′ a marker of DNA oxidation, was demonstrated to induce mutagenic changes aside from interfering with gene expression (19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Study Design and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1 O 2 does not react with 2-deoxyribose, it cannot cut the DNA backbone, and previously reported formation of DNA nicks can be explained by secondary oxidation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine by 1 O 2 [77]. Details about reactive species, mechanisms of oxidatively generated DNA modifications, reactivity of products and biological consequences can be found elsewhere [85,86,87]. …”
Section: Photodynamic Targets At the Molecular Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, UV and NMR spectroscopic measurements (Culp et al 1989;Cho et al 1990;Kouchakdjian et al 1991;Oda et al 1991) together with theoretical calculations (Aida and Nishimura 1987; Venkatatesmarlu and Leszczynski 1998) indicate that the 6,8-diketo (i.e., 8-oxodGuo) is the predominant form in solution. For this reason, we prefer using the name for the nucleobase (8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, 8-oxoGua) or for the nucleoside (8-oxodGuo) for describing this ubiquitous DNA oxidation product (Cooke et al 2010;Cadet et al 2012d). However, Kasai and Nishimura, who discovered the base lesion in 1983 (Kasai and Nishimura 1983) retain the term of 8-hydroxyguanine (Nishimura 2011).…”
Section: Singlet Oxygenmentioning
confidence: 99%