Biology, Bias, or Both? The Contribution of Sex and Gender to the Disparity in Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Women and Men

Abstract

Purpose of Review Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide for both men and women. However, CVD is understudied, underdiagnosed, and undertreated in women. This bias has resulted in women being disproportionately affected by CVD when compared to men. The aim of this narrative review is to explore the contribution of sex and gender on CVD outcomes in men and women and offer recommendations for researchers and clinicians. Recent Findings Evidence demonstrates that there are sex differences (e.g., menopause and pregnancy complications) and gender differences (e.g., socialization of gender) that contribute to the inequality in risk, presentation, and treatment of CVD in women. Summary To start addressing the CVD issues that disproportionately impact women, it is essential that these sex and gender differences are addressed through educating health care professionals on gender bias; offering patient-centered care and programs tailored to women’s needs; and conducting inclusive health research.

Differences across the lifespan between females and males in the top 20 causes of disease burden globally: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

“… 22 For instance, although the GBD strives to adjust for sources of bias inherent in self-reported data, such as recall bias and desirability bias, as well as non-sampling errors and differential diagnostic patterns, we recognise that the GBD methods are not able to entirely address and correct for all biases in reported data or fully control for differences in diagnostic likelihood for specific conditions. For example, the under-diagnosis and treatment of depression in males 52 and of cardiovascular diseases in females 53 have been previously discussed. Additionally, the effect of imbalanced or incomplete representation of population groups, such as the under-representation of men and some age groups in topic-specific surveys, can skew the accuracy of conclusions drawn regarding the health needs of all people.…”

Predictive values of metabolic score for insulin resistance on risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and comparison with other insulin resistance indices among Chinese with and without diabetes mellitus: Results from the 4C cohort study

“…Moreover, recent findings demonstrate a sex-specific interpretation of the connection between circulating cytokine levels and METS-IR in females 48 . Sex differences in fat distribution and sex-specific risk factors including menopause, reproductive endocrine disorders, and pregnancy complications may partially account for this phenomenon 49 . Collectively, understanding sex differences will aid in the development of individualized MACEs prevention and treatment interventions.…”

Gender Bias in Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review

“…However, men considered their symptoms more seriously and were more likely to visit a cardiologist [ 71 ]. In similar reviews, women were found to be more likely to call 911 for a friend experiencing heart attack symptoms than for themselves and less likely to report their own symptoms [ 7 , 21 , 72 - 75 ]. The latter finding was confirmed by a survey that interviewed 1,000 American women who had reported their lack of awareness of CVDs being the main cause of death among women [ 74 ].…”