2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarker and surrogate development in vascularised composite allograft transplantation: Current progress and future challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the other small molecules of great relevance to allograft stratification are iNOS, ROS, Caspase-3, HMGB-1, and Necrostatin-1. The challenge is identifying readily measurable, decision-worthy small molecules that support predictive analytics [ 70 , 71 ]. These bioassay, biomedical sensor, and possibly biosensor [ 72 ] data may serve as fused inputs into stratification algorithms [ 73 ] such as multi-class linear support vector machines (SVM-L), ensemble bagged decision trees (EBDT), artificial neural network (ANN) classifiers, or possibility rule-based function approximations (PRBFA) classifiers, resulting in a single actionable output score [ 23 ] ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Bioimpedance For Non-invasive Tissue Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the other small molecules of great relevance to allograft stratification are iNOS, ROS, Caspase-3, HMGB-1, and Necrostatin-1. The challenge is identifying readily measurable, decision-worthy small molecules that support predictive analytics [ 70 , 71 ]. These bioassay, biomedical sensor, and possibly biosensor [ 72 ] data may serve as fused inputs into stratification algorithms [ 73 ] such as multi-class linear support vector machines (SVM-L), ensemble bagged decision trees (EBDT), artificial neural network (ANN) classifiers, or possibility rule-based function approximations (PRBFA) classifiers, resulting in a single actionable output score [ 23 ] ( Figure 3 ).…”
Section: Bioimpedance For Non-invasive Tissue Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another set of studies seeks to detect rejection more expeditiously and less invasively than using the Banff classification based on biopsy results [20]. There are many ongoing preclinical rejection models to identify potential biomarkers [21,22]. Others have looked to serum tests for noninvasive biomarkers including matrix metalloproteinase 3 which may complement biopsy to stratify rejection severity [23].…”
Section: Reducing Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kollar et al [ 37 ] found in a pilot study that significantly elevated serum matrix metalloproteinase three levels, as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, were correlated with severe rejection in facial transplantation patients. Despite these findings, a recent review by Honeyman et al [ 38 ] outlined the need for a biomarker that can identify the very early stages of rejection. An assessment of VCA transplantation rejection via skin or sentinel flap is one clinical strategy for tolerance monitoring.…”
Section: Current Vca Regimens and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%