2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers and Prediction of Prognosis in Transthyretin-Related Cardiac Amyloidosis: Direct Comparison of Two Staging Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The NAC ATTR staging system displayed a better prognostic accuracy for ATTR CA than a classification system based on NT-proBNP and TnI. 110 In the article by Gillmore et al 85 patients being classified in the three stages at baseline was similar in both subgroups. Actually, patients with V122I ATTRv CA had slightly higher median NT-proBNP concentrations within stage II and III at baseline compared to ATTRwt CA, possibly reflecting a more advanced disease at diagnosis and/or a more aggressive disease phenotype.…”
Section: Mayo2004 66mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NAC ATTR staging system displayed a better prognostic accuracy for ATTR CA than a classification system based on NT-proBNP and TnI. 110 In the article by Gillmore et al 85 patients being classified in the three stages at baseline was similar in both subgroups. Actually, patients with V122I ATTRv CA had slightly higher median NT-proBNP concentrations within stage II and III at baseline compared to ATTRwt CA, possibly reflecting a more advanced disease at diagnosis and/or a more aggressive disease phenotype.…”
Section: Mayo2004 66mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…recently devised a three‐stage classification system [National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) ATTR staging system] for both ATTRwt and ATTRv CA using NT‐proBNP (cut‐off: 3000 ng/L) and GFR (cut‐off: 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ): 45% of patients were in stage I, 38% in stage II and 16% in stage III, with a median survival of 69.2, 46.7 and 24.1 months, respectively. The NAC ATTR staging system displayed a better prognostic accuracy for ATTR CA than a classification system based on NT‐proBNP and TnI 110 . In the article by Gillmore et al 85 .…”
Section: Biomarkers Of Cardiac Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of diagnosis, prognosis of patients with ATTR-CM can be estimated by stratifying them into one of the three National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) ATTR stages, according to the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). 13,14 Median survival in Stage I, II, and III ATTR-CM is approximately 6, 4, and 2 years, respectively. 13 However, serial calculation of NAC ATTR stage in order to determine whether patients progress through the NAC stages during their disease course and if so whether an increase in NAC ATTR stage is of prognostic relevance has not previously been undertaken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of diagnosis, prognosis of patients with ATTR‐CM can be estimated by stratifying them into one of the three National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) ATTR stages, according to the N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) concentration and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 13,14 . Median survival in Stage I, II, and III ATTR‐CM is approximately 6, 4, and 2 years, respectively 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We confirm that they each have moderate discriminatory ability in their current forms. A recent study comparing the 2 risk models in 175 ATTR-CM patients found that the UK model had better discrimination than the Mayo model ( 25 ). Our analysis found similar results, with the UK model performing slightly better than the Mayo model, although the difference was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%