2017
DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i3.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers in renal transplantation: An updated review

Abstract: Genomics, proteomics and molecular biology lead to tremendous advances in all fields of medical sciences. Among these the finding of biomarkers as non invasive indicators of biologic processes represents a useful tool in the field of transplantation. In addition to define the principal characteristics of the biomarkers, this review will examine the biomarker usefulness in the different clinical phases following renal transplantation. Biomarkers of ischemia-reperfusion injury and of delayed graft function are e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(148 reference statements)
0
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Current biomarkers (i.e. lymphocyte subset analysis, neutrophil function assay, NK activation assay, cytokine production, etc…) have poor sensitivity and specificity, do not reveal slight changes of the immune system and, above all, none of them permit evaluation of the capability of the immune system to control infections 3 . Few immunological techniques are available to measure CMV-specific T-cell immunity and identify transplant recipients at risk of complicated CMV reactivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current biomarkers (i.e. lymphocyte subset analysis, neutrophil function assay, NK activation assay, cytokine production, etc…) have poor sensitivity and specificity, do not reveal slight changes of the immune system and, above all, none of them permit evaluation of the capability of the immune system to control infections 3 . Few immunological techniques are available to measure CMV-specific T-cell immunity and identify transplant recipients at risk of complicated CMV reactivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel biomarkers such as genomic signatures either in the allograft, the peripheral blood, or other fluids also could be useful but would probably require more detailed validation as correlating with clinical endpoints such as graft survival. Several excellent recent reviews of biomarkers outline issues in this area …”
Section: Master Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of DGF is related to donor and recipient parameters such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, immunological response and immunosuppressive medications (6). The prevalence of DGF is signi cantly higher in deceased donor (5-50%) than live donor (4-10%) kidney transplant (7). Unfortunately there is no effective treatment for DGF, however early detection of DGF and intervention treatment may improve outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%