2013
DOI: 10.1037/a0033982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers of threat and reward sensitivity demonstrate unique associations with risk for psychopathology.

Abstract: Two emotional/motivational constructs that have been posited to underlie anxiety and depressive disorders are heightened sensitivity to threat and reduced sensitivity to reward, respectively. It is unclear, though, whether these constructs are only epiphenomena or also connote risk for these disorders (and relatedly, whether they connote risk for separate disorders). Using family history of psychopathology as an indicator of risk, the present study examined whether biomarkers of sensitivity to threat (startle … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greater physical concerns, the ASI-3 dimension most closely connected with risk for panic disorder (Schmidt et al, 1999; van Beek & Griez, 2003), was associated with heightened potentiation in anticipation of unpredictable threat only. This result is consistent with a previous investigation that found a heightened startle response in anticipation of unpredictable (but not predictable) threat was associated with a familial history (i.e., risk) of PD, independent of current anxiety (Nelson et al, 2013). However, the present study and Nelson et al were both cross-sectional and it is unclear whether physical concerns or a heightened sensitivity to unpredictable threat predicts the development of PD, or, alternatively, whether they are concurrent risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Greater physical concerns, the ASI-3 dimension most closely connected with risk for panic disorder (Schmidt et al, 1999; van Beek & Griez, 2003), was associated with heightened potentiation in anticipation of unpredictable threat only. This result is consistent with a previous investigation that found a heightened startle response in anticipation of unpredictable (but not predictable) threat was associated with a familial history (i.e., risk) of PD, independent of current anxiety (Nelson et al, 2013). However, the present study and Nelson et al were both cross-sectional and it is unclear whether physical concerns or a heightened sensitivity to unpredictable threat predicts the development of PD, or, alternatively, whether they are concurrent risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, depression and dysphoria have been linked to a reduced frontal electroencephalogram asymmetry during reward anticipation (Shankman et al, 2013). These findings are complemented by evidence for depressed individuals' blunted feedback-related negativity-a frontally maximal event-related potential associated with reward processing-to monetary gains and losses (e.g., Bress, Smith, Foti, Klein, & Hajcak, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…It concerns not only current states of depression but also recovered patients (McCabe, Cowen, & Harmer, 2009) and populations at risk (Gotlib et al, 2010;Nelson et al, 2013) and has predictive value for the development of depression (Bress, Foti, Kotov, Klein, & Hajcak, 2013). Moreover, reduced reward responsiveness in depression and dysphoria has been observed during both phases of reward processing: the motivational "anticipatory" phase (i.e., "reward wanting") as well as the "consummatory" outcome phase (i.e., "reward liking") (e.g., Forbes et al, 2009;Pizzagalli, Holmes, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Sherdell et al 2012). In addition, individuals with depression or with a family history of depression show reduced frontal EEG asymmetries during reward anticipation (Shankman et al 2007(Shankman et al , 2013Nelson et al 2013Nelson et al , 2014. Further, a recent meta-analysis on neural processing of rewards in depression found evidence for <reduced>?…”
Section: Reward Anticipationmentioning
confidence: 96%