2016
DOI: 10.2489/jswc.71.1.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass and integrated forage/biomass yields of switchgrass as affected by intercropped cool- and warm-season legumes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the different fertilization levels did not significantly affect the yield, and this may be attributed to the switchgrass's low input requirements on the one hand and on the other by the fact that nitrogen-fixing legumes might have supplied a portion of the N diet for switchgrass production. Similar experiments with legume–switchgrass mixed stands resulted in yields that exceeded those of monoculture [ 35 ], in line with the results of the present study. According to previous experiments, cultivating a variety of plants promotes resource conservation, while the synergies between productivity and biodiversity are also strengthened [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, the different fertilization levels did not significantly affect the yield, and this may be attributed to the switchgrass's low input requirements on the one hand and on the other by the fact that nitrogen-fixing legumes might have supplied a portion of the N diet for switchgrass production. Similar experiments with legume–switchgrass mixed stands resulted in yields that exceeded those of monoculture [ 35 ], in line with the results of the present study. According to previous experiments, cultivating a variety of plants promotes resource conservation, while the synergies between productivity and biodiversity are also strengthened [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Differences in polyculture species’ growth habit, management, photosynthetic pathway, and rate of legume maturity impacts the effects of the symbiosis on companion crop [ 7 ]. C 4 grass polycultures had 48% greater CP when grown in mixtures compared to monocultures, whereas diverse C 3 grass mixtures only increased CP by 21%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide biodiversity is in decline, especially in agricultural systems. Positive legume-grass associations have been reported in grassland ecosystems [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], as well as in semi-natural agricultural grasslands [ 4 6 ]; however, research on increased species diversity in C 4 systems has reported little to no NPP benefit in the humid-Southeastern U.S. [ 7 , 8 ]. These studies indicate that variations in sward species diversity, stand age, and photosynthetic pathway of both companion (legume intercrop) and main crops (grass species) may affect NPP, N 2 fixation capabilities, and nutritive quality for animal fodder systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We relate this difference to the biological N 2 fixation in T. pratense , while grass depends on the available N in the soil and rhizosphere. N derived from the atmosphere by biological N 2 fixation can also be susceptible to leaching ( Böhm et al, 2009 ; Warwick et al, 2016 ). Promising further steps in research would be to explicitly combine species in intercropping systems that have complementary root architecture ( Malézieux et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%