2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass and nutrient pools of canopy and terrestrial components in a primary and a secondary montane cloud forest, Costa Rica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
140
5
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
140
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest value reported so far (50 g m -2 y -1 ) was found in a cloud forest in Monteverde, Costa Rica, by Nadkarni and Matelson (1992) which consisted by more than 75% of bryophytes. Epiphyte litterfall measured in our OGF stand (79 g m -2 y -1 ) was higher than the value measured in Monteverde, despite a relatively small epiphyte biomass in the Talamanca OGF stand (3.4 Mg ha -1 in the Talamanca vs. 33.1 Mg ha -1 in Monteverde) (Köhler et al 2008;Nadkarni et al 2004). However, biomass and annual litterfall of epiphytes in different stands are not necessarily related to each other.…”
Section: Litterfall In Tropical Montane Forestscontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…The highest value reported so far (50 g m -2 y -1 ) was found in a cloud forest in Monteverde, Costa Rica, by Nadkarni and Matelson (1992) which consisted by more than 75% of bryophytes. Epiphyte litterfall measured in our OGF stand (79 g m -2 y -1 ) was higher than the value measured in Monteverde, despite a relatively small epiphyte biomass in the Talamanca OGF stand (3.4 Mg ha -1 in the Talamanca vs. 33.1 Mg ha -1 in Monteverde) (Köhler et al 2008;Nadkarni et al 2004). However, biomass and annual litterfall of epiphytes in different stands are not necessarily related to each other.…”
Section: Litterfall In Tropical Montane Forestscontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Parte da biomassa que produzem é consumida por animais ou retorna ao solo, contribuindo com a ciclagem de nutrientes, em locais onde são abundantes. (Benzing 2004, Nadkarni et al 2004, Oliveira 2004. Em especial, as bromélias tanque (como A. bromeliifolia) têm suas folhas arranjadas formando estrutura capaz de reter água e detritos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Segundo Garcia et al (2011), mesmo aquelas consideradas antigas, com cerca de 50 anos, apresentam apenas metade da riqueza das espécies não-arbóreas de ecossistemas de referência. Nadkarni et al (2004) observaram que florestas secundárias apresentam apenas uma diminuta fração da biomassa de epífitas contida nas primárias. Por outro lado, em certas florestas nativas, epífitas sozinhas podem representar um terço do total de espécies vegetais e mais da metade dos indivíduos (Gentry & Dodson 1987).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Many studies have reported that epiphyte communities show complex spatial distribution patterns at various scales: at different altitudes, in a forest, and on a single tree (Hietz and Briones 1998, Lyons et al 2000, Nieder et al 2000, Wolf and Alejandro 2003, Krömer et al 2007, Zotz and Schultz 2008. Epiphyte species and biomass reach great diversity and abundance in primary tropical montane forests, particularly in cloud forests (Nadkarni 1984, Freiberg and Freiberg 2000, Nadkarni et al 2004, Gradstein 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, canopy humus constituted a large proportion of the total EM amount, and epiphyte biomass increased with the accumulation of canopy humus (Ingram and Nadkarni 1993, Nadkarni et al 2004, Köhler et al 2007). In a forest ecosystem, EM contributes to the water and nutrient cycles of the whole forest (Nadkarni 1984, Hsu et al 2002, Nadkarni et al 2004, Köhler et al 2007) and the biodiversity of other organisms by providing food and living space (Nadkarni 1994, Benzing 2004, Sillett and Antoine 2004, Gradstein 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%