2014
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2014.59.1.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass and productivity responses of zooplankton communities to experimental thermocline deepening

Abstract: Lake thermocline depth is likely to be altered with climate change. We assessed the response of crustacean zooplankton biomass and productivity to an experimental whole-lake manipulation of thermocline depth. Weekly sampling occurred in Experimental and Reference years and responses were assessed with a before-after-controlimpact design. While one of three lake basins remained un-manipulated (control), two others experienced thermocline deepening via: active mixing simulating increased wind-stress ('mixing wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, high assimilation of diatoms during fall mixing did not result in a high biomass of Daphnia. We speculate that increasing mixing depth was probably unfavorable to vertically migrating Daphnia because it increases mortality, accompanying a reduction in hypolimnetic refuge volume (Sastri et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, high assimilation of diatoms during fall mixing did not result in a high biomass of Daphnia. We speculate that increasing mixing depth was probably unfavorable to vertically migrating Daphnia because it increases mortality, accompanying a reduction in hypolimnetic refuge volume (Sastri et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…biomass, body size; Gliwicz, ). However, a greater overall zooplankton biomass with thermocline deepening also points to a signal of increased reproductive rates and secondary production in the altered community, as we have demonstrated elsewhere for 1 year (2010) of this study (Sastri et al ., ). In addition to these treatment effects, we also observed some important interannual variation in the experimental responses, indicating that predation effects may accumulate over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These observations thus only partially support our hypothesis that Zoo:Chl should decline in our experiment as a result of increased fish predation because such large biomass increases in small zooplankton were not originally accounted for. On the other hand, the fact that total zooplankton biomass increased supports our hypothesis that increased TP with thermocline deepening may have produced a bottom‐up effect; an observation that is supported by the higher zooplankton production measured (only in 2010) in the experimental basins (Sastri et al ., ). From the zooplankton composition changes observed here, however, we predict that the positive fish biomass response to thermocline deepening observed over these two experimental years (Gillespie, ) may be unsustainable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While the timing of the early season sampling is the same in both years, the timing of the late season sampling differs between years owing to logistical constraints (i.e., timing of In Year 2 (2014), the thermal structure of Experimental Lake was manipulated using a solar-powered hydraulic lift system (Medora Corporation SolarBee 10000v18), which pumps water up from a selected depth and redistributes it to the surface. This is the same system used in other whole-lake manipulations that assessed the biological effects of changing thermocline depth (Cantin et al 2011;Jobin and Beisner 2014;Sastri et al 2014). The SolarBee was deployed by helicopter into the deep area of the lake on 15 June 2014.…”
Section: Whole-lake Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%