2020
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2020-272
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass burning combustion efficiency observed from space using measurements of CO and NO<sub>2</sub> by TROPOMI

Abstract: Abstract. The global fire emission inventories depend on ground and airborne measurements of species-specific emission factors (EFs), which translate dry matter losses due to fires to actual trace gas and aerosol emissions. The EFs of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and carbon monoxide (CO) can function as a proxy for combustion efficiency to distinguish flaming from smoldering combustion. The uncertainties on these EFs remain large as they are limited by the spatial and temporal representativeness of the measurements. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advances in satellite observations also allow us to directly measure atmospheric GHG and aerosol concentrations over BB regions and use this to estimate BB emissions and processes (e.g. Pechony et al, 2013;van der Velde et al, 2020;Zheng et al, 2018). So far, there are significant disparities between the temporal trends and emission ratios derived from bottom-up models (combined with atmospheric transport models), and the atmospheric concentration measured by satellites and fixed ground stations (Eck et al, 2013;Mao et al, 2014;Pechony et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in satellite observations also allow us to directly measure atmospheric GHG and aerosol concentrations over BB regions and use this to estimate BB emissions and processes (e.g. Pechony et al, 2013;van der Velde et al, 2020;Zheng et al, 2018). So far, there are significant disparities between the temporal trends and emission ratios derived from bottom-up models (combined with atmospheric transport models), and the atmospheric concentration measured by satellites and fixed ground stations (Eck et al, 2013;Mao et al, 2014;Pechony et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%