2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.11.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass carbon derived from sisal fiber as anode material for lithium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of carbon materials with high specific surface area and elaborate porous structure has become a research focus for supercapacitor electrode materials . Biomass materials, especially natural materials that contain nitrogen, are renewable with varied sources and low prices, which are the preferred carbon sources for the preparation of porous carbon materials . Various biological materials (such as camellia oleifera shell, lotus leaf, mung bean husks, rice husks, kelp, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of carbon materials with high specific surface area and elaborate porous structure has become a research focus for supercapacitor electrode materials . Biomass materials, especially natural materials that contain nitrogen, are renewable with varied sources and low prices, which are the preferred carbon sources for the preparation of porous carbon materials . Various biological materials (such as camellia oleifera shell, lotus leaf, mung bean husks, rice husks, kelp, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all the anode materials, carbon-based materials are the most widely used lithium storage materials for commercial lithium-ion secondary batteries [1][2][3][4][5]. However, their low lithium intercalation potential is proximately closed to the metallic lithium plating potential, which may induce serious safety problem during usage [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a both possess two relatively broader peaks around 23.5° and 44° (2 θ ), which correspond to the (002) and (100) diffraction of hexagonal graphite, respectively [31, 32]. The decreased intensity of the diffraction peak with KOH activation is ascribed to the turbostratic carbon structure with randomly oriented graphene layers in CGACF, implying a much more developed porosity of CGACF compared with that of CGCF [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%