2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-013-9316-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Drained Fen Peatland Cultivated with Reed Canary Grass under Different Harvest and Fertilizer Regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RCG was fertilized with surface application of 0.6 g N, 0.1 g P and 0.5 g K per mesocosm on 23 July 2012 (corresponding to 80 kg N, 13 kg P and 77 kg K ha −1 ). This fertilization rate corresponded to the rate applied in a previous study at the RCG field site from where the mesocosms were collected (Kandel et al, 2013a), except that the nitrogen rate was slightly increased in the mesocosm study as lower N mineralization was expected at higher GWLs. After the regrowth of RCG in spring 2013, RCG was fertilized with the same amount of fertilizer on 30 April and again in 28 June 2013.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RCG was fertilized with surface application of 0.6 g N, 0.1 g P and 0.5 g K per mesocosm on 23 July 2012 (corresponding to 80 kg N, 13 kg P and 77 kg K ha −1 ). This fertilization rate corresponded to the rate applied in a previous study at the RCG field site from where the mesocosms were collected (Kandel et al, 2013a), except that the nitrogen rate was slightly increased in the mesocosm study as lower N mineralization was expected at higher GWLs. After the regrowth of RCG in spring 2013, RCG was fertilized with the same amount of fertilizer on 30 April and again in 28 June 2013.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Further studies are needed to assess the optimum amount and timing of fertilization required for optimum growth of RCG with acceptable N 2 O emissions. Emissions of N 2 O caused by N fertilization should not offset the benefit of fossil fuel substitution obtained by the fertilizer-induced increase of biomass production (Kandel et al, 2013a). Regarding the overall GHG emission, the CO 2 emissions from ER was clearly the dominant RCG-derived GHG flux.…”
Section: Effect Of Rcg Cultivation On Ghg Balance From Rewetted Peatlandmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, midday net CO 2 uptake also occurred at RCG‐C after intermittent rainfall at the end of June which indicates that nonfertilized RCG cultivations might also sequester CO 2 given sufficient water supply. In comparison, both fertilized and nonfertilized RCG cultivations with VWC > 55% provided midday net CO 2 uptake for the entire growing season in a Danish study (Kandel et al ., ). Daily net CO 2 uptake rates also decreased by about half from wet to dry years in a RCG cultivation in eastern Finland (Shurpali et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The yields in both RCG‐F (2.3 t ha −1 ) and RCG‐C (0.4 t ha −1 ) were at the bottom end of the range of 2.0 to 13.9 t ha −1 and 1.0 to 11.0 t ha −1 previously reported for fertilized and nonfertilized RCG cultivations, respectively (Shurpali et al ., ; Heinsoo et al ., ; Mander et al ., ; Kandel et al ., ; Karki et al ., ). The low yields in this study were likely due to water stress constraining plant growth during an exceptionally dry summer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation