2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterial scaffolds in maxillofacial bone tissue engineering: A review of recent advances

Xiangya Huang,
Yaxin Lou,
Yihong Duan
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that its stiffness is lower than Young's modulus of the tibia bone (18.01 GPa), this suggests that the bone implant is a potential candidate with the requisite lower stiffness required for osseointegration and bone regeneration (Figure 11) [94]. Huang et al [95] comprehensively reviewed several biomaterial scaffolds for applications of maxillofacial BTE. They explained the technical considerations of physical properties (shape, porous structure, microarchitecture and mechanical), biological properties and biomaterials (metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites) required for essential cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and osteogenesis [95].…”
Section: Simulation Of Mechanical Behaviour Of Bte Scaffolds Fem For ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that its stiffness is lower than Young's modulus of the tibia bone (18.01 GPa), this suggests that the bone implant is a potential candidate with the requisite lower stiffness required for osseointegration and bone regeneration (Figure 11) [94]. Huang et al [95] comprehensively reviewed several biomaterial scaffolds for applications of maxillofacial BTE. They explained the technical considerations of physical properties (shape, porous structure, microarchitecture and mechanical), biological properties and biomaterials (metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites) required for essential cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and osteogenesis [95].…”
Section: Simulation Of Mechanical Behaviour Of Bte Scaffolds Fem For ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al [95] comprehensively reviewed several biomaterial scaffolds for applications of maxillofacial BTE. They explained the technical considerations of physical properties (shape, porous structure, microarchitecture and mechanical), biological properties and biomaterials (metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites) required for essential cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and osteogenesis [95]. Polymeric materials give more control over morphological parameters, biocompatibility, and biodegradation [96].…”
Section: Simulation Of Mechanical Behaviour Of Bte Scaffolds Fem For ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 An injectable hydrogel loaded with MgO exhibited excellent capabilities in promoting bone regeneration, including biomineralization and cytocompatibility with MC3T3-E1 cells in vitro. 22 To date, several bone scaffolds, 23 such as bioactive glass, 24 porous bioceramics, 25 nanofiber scaffolds, 26 and injectable materials, 27,28 have been developed in medical fields. Among these materials, injectable hydrogels loaded with boneinducing biomaterials have shown great potential.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several bone scaffolds, such as bioactive glass, porous bioceramics, nanofiber scaffolds, and injectable materials, , have been developed in medical fields. Among these materials, injectable hydrogels loaded with bone-inducing biomaterials have shown great potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restoring a significant large bone or cartilage defect caused by illnesses, accidents, or trauma is one of the most challenging tasks in orthopedic therapeutic settings ( Agarwal et al, 2021 ; Hu et al, 2024 ; Huang et al, 2024 ; Martins et al, 2024 ). While the regeneration of orthopedic tissue is a gradual process, it is also a complicated one that necessitates a wide range of abilities and knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%