2020
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202004776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterials and 3D Bioprinting Strategies to Model Glioblastoma and the Blood–Brain Barrier

Abstract: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and lethal adult primary central nervous system cancer. An immunosuppresive and highly heterogeneous tumor microenvironment, restricted delivery of chemotherapy or immunotherapy through the blood–brain barrier (BBB), together with the brain's unique biochemical and anatomical features result in its universal recurrence and poor prognosis. As conventional models fail to predict therapeutic efficacy in GBM, in vitro 3D models of GBM and BBB leveraging patient‐ or healthy‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They could prompt encapsulation of immune cells for further immunocyte functionalization which lays a solid foundation to build up in vitro 3D experimental models [ 52 ]. Compared to in vivo animal models and in vitro 2D models, 3D frameworks not only possess structurally and functionally physiological environment-mimic matrixes but also permit hierarchical control of biological processes in multidimensions which is extremely required in the explanation of immunomodulatory molecular and cellular mechanisms [ [53] , [54] , [55] ]. Moreover, suitable scaffolds can serve as cell harbour or the entrepot for co-delivering other chemical agents and biologic factors to support engineered cell cultivation [ 45 , 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Tumor Immunotherapy and 3d Scaffold Biomaterials: A Brief Su...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They could prompt encapsulation of immune cells for further immunocyte functionalization which lays a solid foundation to build up in vitro 3D experimental models [ 52 ]. Compared to in vivo animal models and in vitro 2D models, 3D frameworks not only possess structurally and functionally physiological environment-mimic matrixes but also permit hierarchical control of biological processes in multidimensions which is extremely required in the explanation of immunomodulatory molecular and cellular mechanisms [ [53] , [54] , [55] ]. Moreover, suitable scaffolds can serve as cell harbour or the entrepot for co-delivering other chemical agents and biologic factors to support engineered cell cultivation [ 45 , 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Tumor Immunotherapy and 3d Scaffold Biomaterials: A Brief Su...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, DMC-HA displayed acceptable oral bioavailability (40.2%). Discovery of drugs for the treatment of GBM encounters formidable challenges to their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) (31). Thus, we further investigated the distribution of DMC-HA to identify whether it has the ability to cross the BBB.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic and Distribution Study Of Dmc-hamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D bioprinting possesses superior flexibility and controllability on the spatial arrangement of biomaterials and cells, which has been expansively applied to tumor-related studies including TME mimicking, tumor angiogenesis, tumor metastasis, and antitumor drug screening using individual cells and miscellaneous biomaterials[ 18 - 21 ]. Nevertheless, individually dispersed cells within the hydrogel matrix are insufficient in faithfully recapitulating specific disease states either indicating fibrosis or tumor propagation[ 22 ]. In contrast, spheroids could be a perfect alternative and implementable approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%