2013
DOI: 10.3923/jms.2013.615.620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterials for Cartilage Repair: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These may go from simple and non-invasive procedures, such as the use of physiotherapy to strengthen the surrounding muscles and anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce pain and swelling, to resurfacing or even total joint replacement, when the patient's symptoms are already so severe that there is no alternative but surgical intervention [2]. In the latter case, and in a more conservative perspective, some clinicians are opting to use tissue engineering and regenerative medicine products or synthetic cartilage materials to substitute the damaged parts rather than replace the entire joint [3,4]. Synthetic materials are easily controllable and reproducible and minimize the risk of infections, as they do not contain substances derived from human or animal tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These may go from simple and non-invasive procedures, such as the use of physiotherapy to strengthen the surrounding muscles and anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce pain and swelling, to resurfacing or even total joint replacement, when the patient's symptoms are already so severe that there is no alternative but surgical intervention [2]. In the latter case, and in a more conservative perspective, some clinicians are opting to use tissue engineering and regenerative medicine products or synthetic cartilage materials to substitute the damaged parts rather than replace the entire joint [3,4]. Synthetic materials are easily controllable and reproducible and minimize the risk of infections, as they do not contain substances derived from human or animal tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, the most promising biomaterials for this purpose are hydrogels-crosslinked networks of hydrophilic polymers with a high capacity to absorb water and other molecules-which, besides being biocompatible, can be tailored to combine exceptional lubricity with suitable mechanical properties, as in natural cartilage [2,5]. Several possibilities can be found in literature, including hydrogels based on polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol, polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate, silicon rubber, gelatin and polyacrylamide [3,6]. Currently, one of the most studied is PVA [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the avascular and aneural nature of articular cartilage it endows itself with poor intrinsic healing capacity for self-repair [1]. Once the articular cartilage is damaged, osteoarthritis gradually develops and finally the joint loses its function [2]. The surgical techniques, including microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test measures free hemoglobin released into the plasma when blood cells are damaged after coming into contact with the test samples. HR was categorized as nonhemolytic, if HR is 2% or less and hemolytic, if HR exceeded 2% 16 . The results are shown in Table 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently biomaterial‐related infections are a crucial problem and to overcome that biomaterial possessing‐reduced bacterial adherence is the major concern in biomaterial industry 14,15 . Replacement of damaged parts with implants also sometimes ends up with some unpleasant condition such as lack of durability, donor site morbidity (autologous cartilage implants), etc 16 . To overcome such problems, biomaterials have to fulfill some requirements like biocompatibility, flexibility, bacterial adherence followed by reducing donor site morbidity to replace the defective anatomical form 17…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%