2022
DOI: 10.1017/pds.2022.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterials in Everyday Design: Understanding Perceptions of Designers and Non-Designers

Abstract: The application of biological materials in everyday design is gaining traction and designers are encouraged to employ biological systems through biodesign and biophilia. However, there is a deficiency in the understanding of potential consumers’ perceptions. This paper compares the perception of non-designers as well as designers towards design-embedded bio-materials. Data was collected from 234 respondents using an online survey. The findings were gathered by evaluating perception in terms of desirability, pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rating scale questions employed a semantic differential (SD) scale, which consists of a seven-point scale contrasting two bipolar adjectives (e.g., strongly disagree (-3), quite disagree (-2), slightly disagree (-1), neither agree nor disagree (0), slightly agree (1), quite agree (2), strongly agree (3)). This choice of incorporating UX metrics into our questionnaire was based on the proven effectiveness of this approach in transforming qualitative experience data into quantitative data for comparative analysis [19]- [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rating scale questions employed a semantic differential (SD) scale, which consists of a seven-point scale contrasting two bipolar adjectives (e.g., strongly disagree (-3), quite disagree (-2), slightly disagree (-1), neither agree nor disagree (0), slightly agree (1), quite agree (2), strongly agree (3)). This choice of incorporating UX metrics into our questionnaire was based on the proven effectiveness of this approach in transforming qualitative experience data into quantitative data for comparative analysis [19]- [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%